Haha I wish, in that case maybe I should've named it after the less threatening V1 rocket

hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
No, no it doesn't, how about <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oomph!">this?</a>jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:Nah, "doodlebug" doesn't have the same "oomph" to it
edit: btw, do you fancy doing some penetration testing with the sprinkler valve piloted by a blowgun on a hose? I think the issue of pilot volume on sprinklers deserves some cold hard data, and this is an ideal setup to try it out.
MrCrowley wrote:No, no it doesn't, how about <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oomph!">this?</a>
CoolSure, I can put the PB barrel on it or the GB one. Give me some control figures (PSI, ammo, target etc) and I will set one up. Or I could use the smaller <A HREF="http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/viewtop ... 90">SGI</a> if you prefer.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Germans...jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:MrCrowley wrote:No, no it doesn't, how about <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oomph!">this?</a>
omg! *sigh*
There's no rush, education comes firstIt may take awhile for me to complete, I have a physics exam on Friday and a German exam the following Tuesday, but then i'm done with school until February.
As you wish, I suggested no hose as a control in order to know what the maximum potential is, as longthening the hose isn't going to increase peformance.I can start with a 30cm hose length I think, and then go down from that.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
It's actualy one of those patio heaters top thingysspudnik11 wrote:This gun looks great! Have you tried firing something that might go through the trash lid? lol Great job on the paint btw :wav:
Yeah I mean I will do the control test with no hose, but when I do the hose tests since you want to cut 2" of the hose everytime, I will start at 30cm and go down in 5cm at a time.jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:As you wish, I suggested no hose as a control in order to know what the maximum potential is, as longthening the hose isn't going to increase peformance.MrCrowley wrote:I can start with a 30cm hose length I think, and then go down from that.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:2 shots per hose length, each time adding 2 inches.
No, not at alljackssmirkingrevenge wrote:Naturally, it wouldn't make sense to add hose length
Thanks.666lucky693 wrote:sweet cannon i like the camo