Combustion chamber shape
- Gun Freak
- Lieutenant 5
- Posts: 4971
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:38 pm
- Location: Florida
- Been thanked: 8 times
Short and fat is better than long and skinny because the gasses don't have as far to travel.
OG Anti-Hybrid
One man's trash is a true Spudder's treasure!
Golf Ball Cannon "Superna" ■ M16 BBMG ■ Pengun ■ Hammer Valve Airsoft Sniper ■ High Pressure .22 Coax
Holy Shat!
One man's trash is a true Spudder's treasure!
Golf Ball Cannon "Superna" ■ M16 BBMG ■ Pengun ■ Hammer Valve Airsoft Sniper ■ High Pressure .22 Coax
Holy Shat!
- Gun Freak
- Lieutenant 5
- Posts: 4971
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:38 pm
- Location: Florida
- Been thanked: 8 times
Well the endcap is and endcap, and use elbows if you want an over/under or just make an inline.
OG Anti-Hybrid
One man's trash is a true Spudder's treasure!
Golf Ball Cannon "Superna" ■ M16 BBMG ■ Pengun ■ Hammer Valve Airsoft Sniper ■ High Pressure .22 Coax
Holy Shat!
One man's trash is a true Spudder's treasure!
Golf Ball Cannon "Superna" ■ M16 BBMG ■ Pengun ■ Hammer Valve Airsoft Sniper ■ High Pressure .22 Coax
Holy Shat!
Spherical chamber with ignition in the center is the ideal. shoot for that. Try to avoid DWV for extra safety should the projectile fail to exit the barrel. You're looking for something that says "NSF-PW" or has a pressure rating stamped on it. If it says "DWV" or "not safe for pressure," I'd personally advise against it, though you're probably okay with just a combustion.
If you stay away from DWV, you're stuck with one shape of cap and coupler shape, so there really isn't a choice there. There isn't really any way to "direct the charge," since you're just generating a pressure rise inside the entire chamber, the quicker you get the maximum pressure rise, the better.
If you stay away from DWV, you're stuck with one shape of cap and coupler shape, so there really isn't a choice there. There isn't really any way to "direct the charge," since you're just generating a pressure rise inside the entire chamber, the quicker you get the maximum pressure rise, the better.
- Technician1002
- Captain
- Posts: 5189
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:10 am
More important is a sphere is the most effecient shape to hold a volume. As such it has the LEAST amount of surface area exposed to the combustion resulting in the least amount of heat loss to the container.Gun Freak wrote:Short and fat is better than long and skinny because the gasses don't have as far to travel.
A long skinny chamber has lots of surface area to absorb radiant heat from the combustion.
That is OK. I was over 50 when I built my first combustion.This is a sad side note....I'm 33 and have never built one.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
It matters, but not as much as properly metered fuel, and ideal chamber:barrel volume ratio and decent ignition - focus on these things if you're aiming for power.sacklunch wrote:I was wondering if shape of the cb matters to combustion force.
You don't have to be a teenager to enjoy this hobbyI'm 33 and have never built one.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- Brian the brain
- Moderator
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:06 am
- Location: Holland
- Been thanked: 6 times
Missed that topic.
36 myself but then again...almost here for 6 years....
A fat shorter chamber is indeed the thing to go for.
A long skinny chamber could induce DDT ( detonation in stead of combustion)
Spare no money on your first.Get the right stuff.
This hobby is addictive.You'll end up spending more to get it right if you don't do it right the first time.
At 33 and with help from this forum you'd be best off going for something with a chamber fan and fuelmeter.
Not too hard to make but so much better!
36 myself but then again...almost here for 6 years....
A fat shorter chamber is indeed the thing to go for.
A long skinny chamber could induce DDT ( detonation in stead of combustion)
Spare no money on your first.Get the right stuff.
This hobby is addictive.You'll end up spending more to get it right if you don't do it right the first time.
At 33 and with help from this forum you'd be best off going for something with a chamber fan and fuelmeter.
Not too hard to make but so much better!
Gun Freak wrote:
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!
Can't ask for a better compliment!!
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!
Can't ask for a better compliment!!
- mattyzip77
- Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1249
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:22 pm
- Location: Taxachusetts
almost 7 feet seems kinda long, I would go 60 inches, but thats me. Good luck, and welcome!! By the way, Im 34!!!
Go Bruins!!!!
- Technician1002
- Captain
- Posts: 5189
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:10 am
I think he is looking in the restriction in the transition between the chamber and barrel. He has a point. Look at Vortex cannons for a chamber shape with a transition cone between the chamber and barrel. With a projectile, don't use a vortex cannon barrel shape. There is no reason the chamber shape would be useless in a spudgun. if the design is to flow near sonic speeds in the transition space between the chamber and barrel.
Is there merit to this chamber shape? It would be more difficult to build from standard plumbing supplies.
[youtube][/youtube]
Is there merit to this chamber shape? It would be more difficult to build from standard plumbing supplies.
[youtube][/youtube]