barrel size
i have one gun that has 2 feet of 3 in pipe for combustion chamber and 4 ft of 1.5 in barrel. it shoots farther/better than my other gun that has 4 ft of 4in combustion chamber and 4 ft of 2 in barrel. is this just because i dont spray enough right guard? or will the second gun shoot better with a 1.5 in barrel? it seems it would because all the energy would be more compressed in the smaller barrel.
i do about a 3.5 second spray of right guard in the smaller gun and about an 8 second spray in the bigger gun. i havent tried more in the bigger gun yet havent gotten enough time.
i do about a 3.5 second spray of right guard in the smaller gun and about an 8 second spray in the bigger gun. i havent tried more in the bigger gun yet havent gotten enough time.
- daberno123
- Corporal
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Ohio
I'm guessin that your ratio is better on the bigger one, plus the bigger chamber.But don't go by that because i'm too lazy to take the time to figure them out. The perfect C:B ratio is .8:1
BTW there is no way to spray in to much right guard because if you do it simply won't ignite
BTW there is no way to spray in to much right guard because if you do it simply won't ignite
Yeah dude, check out this deal right here cause this will help you out in your quest for a c:b ratio. This deal will calculate everything for you, just punch in the numbers and bingo.
http://www.advancedspuds.com/SpudToolonline.htm
http://www.advancedspuds.com/SpudToolonline.htm
<a href="">DONT TAZE ME BRO.. DONT TAZE ME... AHHHH</a>Yea, that's definitely going to get you at least a tazer.
facebook.com/biggrib
dam so i should really have a barrel thats 4 times as long as my chamber for it to shoot well? thats gay i thought that if i just had a smaller barrel the energy would be compacted for a farther shot. i guess the pressure builds up throughout the barrel
- jimmy101
- Sergeant Major
- Posts: 3199
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am
- Location: Greenwood, Indiana
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
- Contact:
No, the barrel length to chamber length ratio depends on the diameters of the two pipes.jackh wrote:dam so i should really have a barrel thats 4 times as long as my chamber for it to shoot well?
With a 4"ID chamber and a 2"ID barrel the relative area is;
4*4/2*2=4
For a 1:1 chamber to barrel volume ratio, the barrel should be 4X longer than the chamber.
With a 3"ID chamber and a 1.5"ID barrel the relative area is;
3*3/1.5*1.5=4
For a 1:1 chamber to barrel volume ratio, the barrel should be 4X longer than the chamber.
With a 4"ID chamber and a 1.5"ID barrel the relative area is;
4*4/1.5*1.5=7.11
For a 1:1 chamber to barrel volume ratio, the barrel should be 7.11X longer than the chamber.
-
- Specialist 3
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:30 pm
I thought right guard didn't work anymore....?
thats a lot of math. so if i follow these guidelines, my gun should shoot well? so basically i just need to make my barrel longer?jimmy101 wrote:No, the barrel length to chamber length ratio depends on the diameters of the two pipes.jackh wrote:dam so i should really have a barrel thats 4 times as long as my chamber for it to shoot well?
With a 4"ID chamber and a 2"ID barrel the relative area is;
4*4/2*2=4
For a 1:1 chamber to barrel volume ratio, the barrel should be 4X longer than the chamber.
With a 3"ID chamber and a 1.5"ID barrel the relative area is;
3*3/1.5*1.5=4
For a 1:1 chamber to barrel volume ratio, the barrel should be 4X longer than the chamber.
With a 4"ID chamber and a 1.5"ID barrel the relative area is;
4*4/1.5*1.5=7.11
For a 1:1 chamber to barrel volume ratio, the barrel should be 7.11X longer than the chamber.
- jimmy101
- Sergeant Major
- Posts: 3199
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am
- Location: Greenwood, Indiana
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
- Contact:
Yes, your barrels are too short.jackh wrote: thats a lot of math. so if i follow these guidelines, my gun should shoot well? so basically i just need to make my barrel longer?
But, more important than the barrel size, you need a better way to mesaure your fuel. "Squirt-and-screw" ("spray-and-pray") fueling sucks. It is too inconsistent if you are trying to get the best performance from your hunks of PVC pipe.
Get a disposable butane lighter ($0.99) or a Bernzomatic torch ($15) and a syringe ($2). (like this or this)
A chamber fan will also help a lot.
thats too complicated for me at the moment. i just like the extremely simple design of the spray and prays. i guess ill just trash the big gun i dont want a 12 ft gun lying around i dont have any place for it. is there any way to get the peices apart? i glued them with pvc primer and pvc cement
- daberno123
- Corporal
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Ohio
No there is no way to get them apart. Once glued with primer and cemnt they are solvent welded together until the end of time. Build a new gun with C:B in mind
- jimmy101
- Sergeant Major
- Posts: 3199
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am
- Location: Greenwood, Indiana
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
- Contact:
In general yes. If you increase the size of both the chamber and barrel you'll increase the muzzle velocity.jackh wrote:in theory, with the right C:B ratio in mind, the larger the chamber the more distance you get correct?
But, the larger the chamber the more difficult it is to get it to fuel properly. "Squirt-n-screw" is going to really suck as a way to fuel a large chamber.
A smaller chamber with a meter and fan will probably out perform a much larger chamber fueled with "Squirt-n-screw".
The fan's primary purpose is to induce turbulence in the gases, increasing the burn rate significantly. This has been shown to increase performance by over 30% in some launchers.
In terms of performance gains, fans are more effective than metered propane and multiple ignition points combined.
In terms of performance gains, fans are more effective than metered propane and multiple ignition points combined.
Spudfiles' resident expert on all things that sail through the air at improbable speeds, trailing an incandescent wake of ionized air, dissociated polymers and metal oxides.