MAPP gas question
-
- Private 2
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 11:54 am
I just finished my propane canon and it requires 75psi in the meter for the correct 4.03% mixture.
If I use MAPP gas, what is the correct % mix I need? If I know that, I can figure out the required psi.
If I use MAPP gas, what is the correct % mix I need? If I know that, I can figure out the required psi.
- Moonbogg
- Staff Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:20 pm
- Location: SoCal
- Has thanked: 163 times
- Been thanked: 100 times
I actually wondered about that as well. I tried a different program and it called for MAPP pressure much closer to propane while HGDT was way less.niglch wrote:Hmm... I just took a look at HGDT and it seems to disagree with the percentage given on the wiki. HGDT calculates a ~2% mix (by volume) while the wiki says 4.6%.
- jimmy101
- Sergeant Major
- Posts: 3199
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am
- Location: Greenwood, Indiana
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
- Contact:
The proper fuel ratio for MAPP is a bit of a problem. MAPP is a mitutre of things, primarily methyl acetylene, propadiene and propane. The exact mixture is ...?
Methyl acetylene and propadiene have the same fuel ratio (since they are chemical isomers and have the same molecular formula); 4.98% if the fuel displaces some of the air in the chamber and 5.24% if the fuel doesn't displace any air.
Methyl Acetylene (C3H4): CH3—C≡CH
Propadiene (C3H4): CH2=C=CH2
The fuel ratio then depends on the amount of methyl acetylene/propadiene versus propane in the mix.
The 4.6% (additive, not displacive) quoted in the Wiki MAPP page appears to be based on the mixture being about 67% propane.
Methyl acetylene and propadiene have the same fuel ratio (since they are chemical isomers and have the same molecular formula); 4.98% if the fuel displaces some of the air in the chamber and 5.24% if the fuel doesn't displace any air.
Methyl Acetylene (C3H4): CH3—C≡CH
Propadiene (C3H4): CH2=C=CH2
The fuel ratio then depends on the amount of methyl acetylene/propadiene versus propane in the mix.
The 4.6% (additive, not displacive) quoted in the Wiki MAPP page appears to be based on the mixture being about 67% propane.
- Moonbogg
- Staff Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:20 pm
- Location: SoCal
- Has thanked: 163 times
- Been thanked: 100 times
So either way, more mapp is needed than propane, right? I found mapp to be very forgiving for some reason. I used it for 2x shots and tried 80psi in the meter pipe as well as 50psi and both worked about the same from what I could tell without a chrony.
-
- Private 2
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 11:54 am
I was wondering about that, because on this link http://www.spudfiles.com/spud_wiki/inde ... n_Spudguns it shows propane to be 4.02% and MAPP to be 4.98%, but then you go to this link http://www.spudfiles.com/spud_wiki/index.php/MAPP and it says 4.2% and 4.6% respectively, so what is the correct value?jimmy101 wrote:The proper fuel ratio for MAPP is a bit of a problem. MAPP is a mitutre of things, primarily methyl acetylene, propadiene and propane. The exact mixture is ...?
Methyl acetylene and propadiene have the same fuel ratio (since they are chemical isomers and have the same molecular formula); 4.98% if the fuel displaces some of the air in the chamber and 5.24% if the fuel doesn't displace any air.
Methyl Acetylene (C3H4): CH3—C≡CH
Propadiene (C3H4): CH2=C=CH2
The fuel ratio then depends on the amount of methyl acetylene/propadiene versus propane in the mix.
The 4.6% (additive, not displacive) quoted in the Wiki MAPP page appears to be based on the mixture being about 67% propane.
I have the spudtool.xls file that will tell me the correct PSI based on my cannon's dimensions and desired %, but whe Wiki contradicts itself I don't know what to use.
- D_Hall
- Staff Sergeant 5
- Posts: 1920
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:37 pm
- Location: SoCal
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 42 times
LOL... Ya know, you folks may have something there...
When I wrote HGDT I concentrated on the propane stuff but included logic for MAPP. I threw in some values for various MAPP-related things, but I'm not 100% sure I ever went back to correct all of it. I know I did the flame propogation rate... But fuel mixture? I'm honestly not sure.
When I wrote HGDT I concentrated on the propane stuff but included logic for MAPP. I threw in some values for various MAPP-related things, but I'm not 100% sure I ever went back to correct all of it. I know I did the flame propogation rate... But fuel mixture? I'm honestly not sure.
- jimmy101
- Sergeant Major
- Posts: 3199
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am
- Location: Greenwood, Indiana
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
- Contact:
Actually, if you look closely at the MAPP entry in the Common_Fuels_for_Combustion_Spudguns Wiki page you'll notice that no values is given for MAPP. There are values for methyl acetylene and for propadiene but not MAPP itself.Budarooski wrote: I was wondering about that, because on this link http://www.spudfiles.com/spud_wiki/inde ... n_Spudguns it shows propane to be 4.02% and MAPP to be 4.98%, but then you go to this link http://www.spudfiles.com/spud_wiki/index.php/MAPP and it says 4.2% and 4.6% respectively, so what is the correct value?
I have the spudtool.xls file that will tell me the correct PSI based on my cannon's dimensions and desired %, but whe Wiki contradicts itself I don't know what to use.
Here is the MSDS for MAPP. There are six things in it and the exact percentages aren't stated, just ranges. <table><tr><td> Name<td>Chemical Formula</td><td>Percentage Range</td></tr> <tr><td> Propyene</td><td>CH3-CH=CH2</td><td>40 - 50</td></tr> <tr><td> Methyl Acetylene</td><td>CH3-C≡CH</td><td>27 - 33</td></tr> <tr><td> Propadiene</td><td>CH2=C=CH2</td><td>13 - 15</td></tr> <tr><td> Isobutane</td><td>CH3-CH(CH3)-CH3</td><td> 2 - 5</td></tr> <tr><td> n-Butane</td><td>CH3-CH2-CH2-CH3</td><td> 2 - 5</td></tr> <tr><td> Propane</td><td>CH3-CH2-CH3</td><td> 1 - 5</td></tr></table>
When calculating the fuel percentage Methyl acetylene and propadiene are the same. n-Butane and isobutane are the same.
- mark.f
- Sergeant Major 4
- Posts: 3638
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 11:18 am
- Location: The Big Steezy
- Has thanked: 58 times
- Been thanked: 60 times
- Contact:
I remember working this out in Junior year on a sheet of notebook paper and getting an additive percentage of around 4.89%. Can't remember where I got my figures but I have been using my figure in both combustion and hybrid cannons since then with success. Guess it's time to sit down and work it out again to see if I get the same number.
Although I doubt the small difference effects final mixture much unless using a volumetric meter at high compressions.
EDIT: I remember now. The MSDS I used (from BernzOmatic's site, since I use their gas) quoted 56% LPG and 44% methylacetylene, which I then extrapolated further using the average fuel percentages for LPG.
Although I doubt the small difference effects final mixture much unless using a volumetric meter at high compressions.
EDIT: I remember now. The MSDS I used (from BernzOmatic's site, since I use their gas) quoted 56% LPG and 44% methylacetylene, which I then extrapolated further using the average fuel percentages for LPG.
My working rule of thumb has been to add 20% more psi for MAPP on your fuel meter. Sooo if you build a meter that requires 50 psi for propane, bump it to 60 psi for MAPP.
I too have found MAPP to have a much larger margin for error.
I too have found MAPP to have a much larger margin for error.
- mark.f
- Sergeant Major 4
- Posts: 3638
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 11:18 am
- Location: The Big Steezy
- Has thanked: 58 times
- Been thanked: 60 times
- Contact:
Well, I reworked it using 56% liquefied petroleum gas and 44% methylacetylene/propadiene. Since I don't know what "blend" of LPG the fuel producers are using, I simply treated the LPG as propane. Got an additive ratio of 7/152 or around 4.6%.
I guess the real source of variability of the constituting fuels is that the companies use 56% LPG and 44% methylacetylene/propadiene mixture, but the makeup of those two gases is variable since they probably get them from outside sources.
I guess the real source of variability of the constituting fuels is that the companies use 56% LPG and 44% methylacetylene/propadiene mixture, but the makeup of those two gases is variable since they probably get them from outside sources.
-
- Private 2
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 11:54 am
That's funny...that's what I was thinking.Moonbogg wrote:Screw it. Start with 5% then tweak from there.