SpudFiles

i was just wondering which would be more powerful if built the same size, a inline or over and under?

and they will be powered by propane.

I would have to say inline, no bends to slow things down...

okay, would you say that there is a noticeable difference between the two?

Depends on how small you can measure time....millaseconds???

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras nec placerat erat. Vivamus dapibus egestas nunc, at eleifend neque. Suspendisse potenti. Sed dictum lacus eu nisl pretium vehicula. Ut faucibus hendrerit nisi. Integer ultricies orci eu ultrices malesuada. Fusce id mauris risus. Suspendisse finibus ligula et nisl rutrum efficitur. Vestibulum posuere erat pellentesque ornare venenatis. Integer commodo fermentum tortor in pharetra. Proin scelerisque consectetur posuere. Vestibulum molestie augue ac nibh feugiat scelerisque. Sed aliquet a nunc in mattis.

Depends what you mean by "built the same size"

If you mean the same overall length, then an inline would have a shorter barrel and chamber than the over/under and this would negate any performance gained by lack of bends.

ah so you cant really tell that theres a difference. okay i've got more of an idea on what to build now thanks.

coujin wrote:okay i understand now.

Edited by jrrdw.

If you mean OVERALL length, as in the length of the entire gun, then obviously an inline would have a massive disadvantage.
If you mean COMBINED length, as in barrel+chamber as measured individually, then the bend is the only disadvantage to the over/under.