About explosion pressure
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
I don't know if anyone has made a specific side by side comparison, but while the ratio of oxygen to propane is the same in both cases, there are important differences.
Working with pure oxygen is a lot more dangerous so it is less practical, and there is a danger of DDT especially at higher mixes. This might cause a dramatic spike in pressure, but will not necessarily result in a more powerful launcher. It's the reason we use relatively slow burning propellants in firearms and not high explosives.
In his tests with the high performance hybrid linked to elsewhere, he noted that he got better and more consistent performance with compressed air as opposed to pure oxygen.
Working with pure oxygen is a lot more dangerous so it is less practical, and there is a danger of DDT especially at higher mixes. This might cause a dramatic spike in pressure, but will not necessarily result in a more powerful launcher. It's the reason we use relatively slow burning propellants in firearms and not high explosives.
In his tests with the high performance hybrid linked to elsewhere, he noted that he got better and more consistent performance with compressed air as opposed to pure oxygen.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
-
- Private 3
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2022 1:59 am
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
But if my barrel is short, I may choose pure oxygen, because it burns fast enough, and compressed air is more suitable for long barrel. I think the difference is just like a pistol and a rifle. A pistol must use gunpowder with a fast burning rate to accelerate for a short time, while a rifle barrel is long enough to burn fully.jackssmirkingrevenge wrote: ↑Tue Nov 08, 2022 9:18 amI don't know if anyone has made a specific side by side comparison, but while the ratio of oxygen to propane is the same in both cases, there are important differences.
Working with pure oxygen is a lot more dangerous so it is less practical, and there is a danger of DDT especially at higher mixes. This might cause a dramatic spike in pressure, but will not necessarily result in a more powerful launcher. It's the reason we use relatively slow burning propellants in firearms and not high explosives.
In his tests with the high performance hybrid linked to elsewhere, he noted that he got better and more consistent performance with compressed air as opposed to pure oxygen.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
That sounds like it would be logical, personally however I would still be very wary of handling pure oxygen.yyt wrote: ↑Wed Nov 09, 2022 2:19 amBut if my barrel is short, I may choose pure oxygen, because it burns fast enough, and compressed air is more suitable for long barrel. I think the difference is just like a pistol and a rifle. A pistol must use gunpowder with a fast burning rate to accelerate for a short time, while a rifle barrel is long enough to burn fully.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life