Hopefully this isn't a repost but this came up as an ad on facebook: http://air-ordnance.com/index.php?osCsi ... 536135712c
Reminds me of that "Fully Automatic BB Machine Gun" that was in the works a while ago (IIRC one of their reps even posted about it here) but this one is actually in production.
It's expensive as hell ($550) but looks to be a quality machine based on the 98 design. Made by Tippmann, too.
Any thoughts?
SMG-22
-
- Staff Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:18 pm
- Location: United States
- POLAND_SPUD
- Captain
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 4:43 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
sweet.... sure it is expensive but I really really like those belts... they cost just 10$
Children are the future
unless we stop them now
unless we stop them now
- inonickname
- First Sergeant 4
- Posts: 2606
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 3:27 am
http://air-ordnance.com/images/pdf/Manu ... 536135712c
Specs and an exploded view there if you're interested.
Specs and an exploded view there if you're interested.
PimpAssasinG wrote:no im strong but you are a fat gay mother sucker that gets raped by black man for fun
Nifty.
Star gears pulling the belt in, hammer valve and some kind of feedback line which seems to recock using part of the gas released from the hammer.
Star gears pulling the belt in, hammer valve and some kind of feedback line which seems to recock using part of the gas released from the hammer.
-
- Staff Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:18 pm
- Location: United States
Looks like a Response Trigger.Hotwired wrote:Nifty.
Star gears pulling the belt in, hammer valve and some kind of feedback line which seems to recock using part of the gas released from the hammer.
The line going back?PVC Arsenal 17 wrote:Looks like a Response Trigger.Hotwired wrote:Nifty.
Star gears pulling the belt in, hammer valve and some kind of feedback line which seems to recock using part of the gas released from the hammer.
Well its described as controlling rate of fire in the manual. Describe what you're meaning?
-
- Staff Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:18 pm
- Location: United States
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
Reminds me of the mags used in the Anics series, though they are a continuous loop and cycled by the trigger.
The subject of this thread however can theoretically use belts as long as the user can afford, nice.
[youtube][/youtube]
Looks like a pain to reload though, took him 10 seconds to dump the 100 round belt. I get frustrated loading 12 rounds in the Monsoon mag
Not as cool but this conversion (basically a hopper and detent) is a damn sight cheaper, though it can't be used for pellets.
The subject of this thread however can theoretically use belts as long as the user can afford, nice.
Ditto, has potential for a homebuild design.I really really like those belts... they cost just 10$
[youtube][/youtube]
Looks like a pain to reload though, took him 10 seconds to dump the 100 round belt. I get frustrated loading 12 rounds in the Monsoon mag
Not as cool but this conversion (basically a hopper and detent) is a damn sight cheaper, though it can't be used for pellets.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
-
- Staff Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:18 pm
- Location: United States
Can't argue with that. It's so tempting to build a beltfed gun with a simple electronic star gear indexing system, but even if I wanted to I couldn't. Given the caliber and intended ammo, an airgun like this is considered a firearm where I live. And therefore it's illegal for a citizen to manufacture a receiver himself. Even if I could, there's a 15 round cap on all forms of ammo feeding systems, belts included. Fun is outlawed in the People's Republic of New Jersey. At least they still let me put a bayonet on my shotgun.jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:Ditto, has potential for a homebuild design.I really really like those belts... they cost just 10$
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
Typical demonstration intended for the velocity mad US public, velocity figures given with no reference to pellet weight.django wrote:Jesus Christ check this demo out, I wouldn't want that firing at me LOL!!
Assuming a medium weight 16 grain pellet (which it probably isn't), that's less than 11 foot pounds of muzzle energy for a velocity of 550 feet per second, not impressive in airgun terms (except of course you have 100 rounds + on tap!)
Also, the variation in velocity is quite dramatic, though of course this isn't intended for target shooting so it hardly matters.
Surely you can make something likethis?It's so tempting to build a beltfed gun with a simple electronic star gear indexing system, but even if I wanted to I couldn't
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- Gaderelguitarist
- Corporal
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:56 pm
- Location: Columbia, MD
- Contact:
It seems to be a design trade off, losing power for rof. Still very cool, and I could see a star eyed youth wanting this very badly. That target shooting demonstration is probably at a maximum range of ten feet. Loading the belt would be a royal PITA. From the pictures in the manual, the quick loading tool is two blocks of oak. Fancy fancy.
I could see someone with machining capabilities building something similar to this with the intent to bring power into priority. The Ajax Razorfang (previously posted) has not only the capability to adjust rate of fire, but they seem to be planning a less powerfull "international" model.
I could see someone with machining capabilities building something similar to this with the intent to bring power into priority. The Ajax Razorfang (previously posted) has not only the capability to adjust rate of fire, but they seem to be planning a less powerfull "international" model.
so many muchness