Ah, but imagine this is an auto, if you make the valve more efficient, it will give you lower power but much more shots, so the total ft/lbs hitting the target will be higher <--- more POWER!When the reservoir has the volume to keep the barrel behind the projectile at maximum pressure, the projectile will travel faster, but as the projectile leaves the barrel, a lot of gas will be wasted.
I has semi-auto! FX Monsoon
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- Brian the brain
- Moderator
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:06 am
- Location: Holland
- Been thanked: 6 times
Nope...Just like an epoxy-made-Snapvalve---> you've got it all wrong ( ouch!! )
Why three mags if all that power could be put behind 1??
(just teasing )
Why three mags if all that power could be put behind 1??
(just teasing )
Gun Freak wrote:
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!
Can't ask for a better compliment!!
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!
Can't ask for a better compliment!!
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
It will actually give more than three mags, but the power will start to drop off and it will be impossible to shoot accurately. Besides, there won't be many things I'll be shooting that will need more than 36 shots at 30 ft/lbs
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- potatoflinger
- Sergeant 2
- Posts: 1136
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 3:26 pm
- Location: Maryland
You could even look at cars for example, the new ones are a lot more efficient than older ones, but they have a lot less power than older cars.
It's hard to soar with eagles when you're working with turkeys.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
Imagine you had an old car and a new car stretching a giant slingshot, for a given amount of petrol, the new car would give you a better shot.potatoflinger wrote:You could even look at cars for example, the new ones are a lot more efficient than older ones, but they have a lot less power than older cars.
Look at it this way:
For spudguns, imagine a pneumatic with a 5 foot long 1 inch barrel and a 4 inch chamber of similar length - powerful, and very inefficient.
If I had to lengthen the barrel of this imaginary launcher by another 5 feet, I would get a much more efficient launcher, and a much more powerful one.
Catch my drift?
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- Brian the brain
- Moderator
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:06 am
- Location: Holland
- Been thanked: 6 times
Yes..You are right....
sigh...
not...
There is no end to these enhancements..what if you enlared the chamber again?? It would be more wasteful, but have more power!!
The chicken and egg discussion is easier to end that this one!!
sigh...
not...
There is no end to these enhancements..what if you enlared the chamber again?? It would be more wasteful, but have more power!!
The chicken and egg discussion is easier to end that this one!!
Gun Freak wrote:
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!
Can't ask for a better compliment!!
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!
Can't ask for a better compliment!!
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
the size and pressure of the chamber dictates what power you're putting into it, so personally I count efficiency for these values being fixed.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- Brian the brain
- Moderator
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:06 am
- Location: Holland
- Been thanked: 6 times
In case you want to know wich was first:
The egg...
The egg...
Gun Freak wrote:
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!
Can't ask for a better compliment!!
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!
Can't ask for a better compliment!!
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
As long as it's not a DWV egg
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
having a nice little instant messaging chat the forum?
- potatoflinger
- Sergeant 2
- Posts: 1136
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 3:26 pm
- Location: Maryland
Well, I guess you are right, to some extent. A launcher that has a huge chamber and a small barrel will have more power than a launcher with the same size barrel but an "efficiently sized" chamber, but the efficient gun will have more power for it's size.
It's hard to soar with eagles when you're working with turkeys.
Just depends on how you use the term "efficient".
I like the car analogy that potatoflinger used.
Cars are more efficient now, meaning they use less gass and go farther. But older cars are "gas guzzlers" meaning that they used more gas, but are more powerful in using that xtra gas that is not needed.
The same can apply for a spudgun.
I like the car analogy that potatoflinger used.
Cars are more efficient now, meaning they use less gass and go farther. But older cars are "gas guzzlers" meaning that they used more gas, but are more powerful in using that xtra gas that is not needed.
The same can apply for a spudgun.
4SPC, My 4" piston 3" porting cannon
Memo:
Fix up copper cannon
Fix up 4SPC
Start Stirrup pump
Start Toolies piston bazooka
Memo:
Fix up copper cannon
Fix up 4SPC
Start Stirrup pump
Start Toolies piston bazooka
-
- Staff Sergeant 2
- Posts: 1603
- Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:59 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
The sounds that the fx produces are just too cool! Thanks for rubbing in the fact that you can unleash 300lb of energy in what, 5 seconds Lovely rifle Jack, have fun!
America, the greatest gangster of all time. With 200 million odd foot soldiers at it's whim and call.
When you fill your car with refined oil remember that it has been paid for with blood and guts, some from your own countrymen, most not.
When you fill your car with refined oil remember that it has been paid for with blood and guts, some from your own countrymen, most not.
Not exactly. If I had to face a nasty type and had for a choice of weapon - a vortex strafer that fires a hundred 1 ft-lb shots a second or a .32 ACP pistol that could fire one 100 ft-lb shot a second, I'd choose the pistol.jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:Ah, but imagine this is an auto, if you make the valve more efficient, it will give you lower power but much more shots, so the total ft/lbs hitting the target will be higher <--- more POWER!
As for cars, launchers and guns - here we have Mr Jeremy Clarkson being totally over the top again:
[youtube][/youtube]
Anyway, wonderful piece of kit there JSR. I'd like one of those if I could - but I'll be building something slightly different instead... again, you'll have to wait to find out.
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
That's pretty much what I meant, for a given amount of air you're putting in, there is a given amount of power you can obtain - inefficency means you're not achieving the full power potentialpotatoflinger wrote:A launcher that has a huge chamber and a small barrel will have more power than a launcher with the same size barrel but an "efficiently sized" chamber, but the efficient gun will have more power for it's size.
It actually sounds quite different in real life, I don't know how it came out sounding like that. Ah well, my cellphone camera is now the only one that I have that can record sound too, better than nothing. Actually I can empty the magazine in much less than 5 seconds, as fast as you can pull the trigger really, and with a bit of tinkering (but for legal reasons and becuase I don't have a room full of SCUBA bottles, I'm staying semi with this).The sounds that the fx produces are just too cool! Thanks for rubbing in the fact that you can unleash 300lb of energy in what, 5 seconds
If I had to face a nasty type and had for a choice of weapon - a vortex strafer that fires a hundred 1 ft-lb shots a second or a .32 ACP pistol that could fire one 100 ft-lb shot a second, I'd choose the pistol.
Fair enough, the 0.32 would penetrate deeper and indeed a single shot to the head could be lethal. Still, I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss the strafer though - if you could keep up the rate of fire, it could chew someone up very quickly, especially if aimed at the face - I wouldn't continue attacking someone while being pelted by 100 BBs per second. Besides, the strafer also has a much, much higher hit probability, it's easier to "hose someone down" with BBs as opposed to single shots at one per second.
A friend of mine at the club also bought a Monsoon, he wants to try it out for skeet
Pull!
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life