pneumatics vs combustion
-
- Private
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 1:33 pm
Pneumatics may be safer but i think that the fact that it could blow up in your hand's kind of adds some of the fun to shooting combustion launchers, but i would say pneumatics are all around better guns besides the wait but combustions are much funner to shoot.
Arg! Pneumatics arent safer! Rather that noobs first cannon is a combustion and generally dont have proper construction skills, its not the method in which it is shoot. *flush* Anyways ya I will agree that combustions are funner then pneumatics. Obviously the method of pneumatic firing is generally more powerful, but its the "BOOM" factor. (it changes everytime I say it) When using PG's I have noticed a few things that I like noise, distance, consturction challenge/ "newness" (sometimes countered by cost), and thats all I can think of.
Combustions are defintly funner. You got a "BOOM!" and a fireball compared to a "hissssss" and a little puff. More portable (appeals to younger users because of energy level). Easyer to build. I have my CS-X sitting on my porch and when ever I get bored I just go out there and shoot a couple GB's and come back in.
Combustions are defintly funner. You got a "BOOM!" and a fireball compared to a "hissssss" and a little puff. More portable (appeals to younger users because of energy level). Easyer to build. I have my CS-X sitting on my porch and when ever I get bored I just go out there and shoot a couple GB's and come back in.
overpressurize the chamber? who has an air compressor that pumps a tank over 150 psi? Probably no one, that is because all typical air tools run under 100 PSI (air ratchet, paint gun, impact wrench etc) i think pneumatics are safer due to the fact that there is no flaming fuel involved for burnt eyebrows. But for portability and ease of use i definatly go with a combustion. If i was gonna show off a potato cannon i would pick up my combustion rather than my pneumatic just because its more practical to use. Dont have to lug around a bike pump/car tire pump.
When it comes to someone who isnt really impressed by a bbq clicker and water pipe thrown together by the regular amature i whip out my propane filled, stun gun ignited, dual spark, shoulder fired, rocket launcher i use for PVC rockets. note, the barrel is actually about a 3 feet longer, i cut the pic to fit it on my website
When it comes to someone who isnt really impressed by a bbq clicker and water pipe thrown together by the regular amature i whip out my propane filled, stun gun ignited, dual spark, shoulder fired, rocket launcher i use for PVC rockets. note, the barrel is actually about a 3 feet longer, i cut the pic to fit it on my website
Mine goes up to 120, but did you ever think of other pressure sources? What about CO2 (800psi)? Hopefully that wasnt a attempt to "slam" me.SpudShot-SS wrote:overpressurize the chamber? who has an air compressor that pumps a tank over 150 psi? Probably no one, that is because all typical air tools run under 100 PSI
Anyways, Nice Gun! Are you going to post it? (well at least I dont think it has been posted...) If not submit a new topic and if you would get a close up of the project box.
oops, forgot about CO2, and no i wasnt slammin ya dude. If you do have an air compressor that regulates over 135 psi its definatly an oddball, you cant go into a lowes or home cheapo and pick one up off the shelf that pumps over 150.pimpmann22 wrote: Mine goes up to 120, but did you ever think of other pressure sources? What about CO2 (800psi)? Hopefully that wasnt a attempt to "slam" me.
Anyways, Nice Gun! Are you going to post it? (well at least I dont think it has been posted...) If not submit a new topic and if you would get a close up of the project box.
better pic? just a trading card box with the guts of a 100,000v stun gun neatly placed inside with a 9v NI-MH rechargable
- Technician
- Private 3
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 8:03 am
- Location: USA, Ohio
- Contact:
I like the combustions merely because they are truly portable and self-contained if built correctly. Tie a 50 pound bag of spuds to your belt (better get suspenders) and go for it.
With a pneumatic you are tied to a compressor one way or another.
With a pneumatic you are tied to a compressor one way or another.
- Lucas_Pukas
- Private 3
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 9:53 pm
- Location: Colorado
I like the combustions. Granted I am a pyromaniac (or thats what most people would refer to me as) so I am partial to flames and explosions. Also, that is all I have ever built so I am biased. And as for the dispute over safety between pneumo/combustion, I think it all boils down to the shooter and also the builder. Know your limits and the limits of your cannon(s).
- guitarfreak
- Private 4
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:41 pm
- Location: hawera,new zealand
- Contact:
i totally agree,i have 1 of each,and they both have their ovn dangers. i bet you 5 dollars that you cant singe all the hair off your arm with a pneumatic,but i find it hard to imagine a combustion's chamber rupturing,when used in normal conditionsLucas_Pukas wrote:I like the combustions. Granted I am a pyromaniac (or thats what most people would refer to me as) so I am partial to flames and explosions. Also, that is all I have ever built so I am biased. And as for the dispute over safety between pneumo/combustion, I think it all boils down to the shooter and also the builder. Know your limits and the limits of your cannon(s).
RECT forum;!;<area shape="rect" coords="510,8,13,57" href="http://thecrater.proboards75.com/index.cgi#general" target="">
- deathtodeer666
- Specialist
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2005 12:57 am
- Location: mars alabama
- Contact:
I love both but if I had to pick one to shoot the rest of my life id go for combustion mainly because I like to add wires and buttons and tread propane torches, besides for me its all about the build its all I do, I once made a prototype cigarette lighter in one day at school I always have parts on me, any body like me?
I just finished making two pill bottle minis and a mini. Now i want to make a bb sniper modeled after a m-82 sniper rifle. I want it to look just like the m-82 so this limits my space to a confined area. which one should i make it, to give me the most power?
-
- Private
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 10:46 am
Hello all I do WWII re-enacting. 1st and for most i need some big help !!! I bought a Spanish 60 mm mortar for reenacting. The ontl 2 problems in which i face are # 1 ). how to propel? 2nd how to build a mortar rounf that flys around the 400-600 yrd range and explodes upon/before, or seconds after inpact. Now saying that the warheads we use in this hobby are not leathal more lie an m-80 . Anyhow i`m putting my email on this so if anyone would like to look at pictures of the mortar i can mail them directly to you,also if you don`t mind i am willing to speak over the phone,(if it costs you $$$ to talk long distance call me tell me who you are/what the topic is and we`ll hang up and i`ll call you and put it on my dime !) my home # is (301)-737-0828 and my email is charles_pauley2@yahoo.com please someone with skills in steel ,bronze and propellants please contact me ! lol Best regards , Sgt. Pauley