How-to: remote ignition
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
Brilliant perhaps dewey can weigh in on this one?
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
What do want me to weigh?jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:Brilliant perhaps dewey can weigh in on this one?
Let me do some research on the Receiver and Transmitter modules.
There needs to be encoding/decoding circuits as well.
Note that they are on the same frequency as the RC remote firing system.
I think a fiberglass or plastic tube would be ideal for the body so it does not reduce the transmitter range due to excess metal shielding.
JSR; see if you can locate fluorescent tube plastic containers. They maybe cheaper than fiberglass and possibly strong enough.
The nose cone would be the only metallic piece.
MrC; What is the exact bore dimension in that new barrel?
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
The sanity of leaving MrC to his own devicesdewey-1 wrote:What do want me to weigh?
My thoughts exactlyI think a fiberglass or plastic tube would be ideal for the body so it does not reduce the transmitter range due to excess metal shielding.
I was thinking PVC tube would be up to the job...JSR; see if you can locate fluorescent tube plastic containers. They maybe cheaper than fiberglass and possibly strong enough.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
PVC is to heavy and has thick walls.
You need a thinner walled plastic tube. Even ABS thin wall would be better.
I will do some searching.
You need a thinner walled plastic tube. Even ABS thin wall would be better.
I will do some searching.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
Sectional density good plus it can't be too weak or it will fold on firing.dewey-1 wrote:PVC is to heavy and has thick walls.
You need a thinner walled plastic tube. Even ABS thin wall would be better.
Stupid question, can a metal body be used as an aerial of sorts?
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
The sectional density would be in the nose cone.jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:Sectional density good plus it can't be too weak or it will fold on firing.dewey-1 wrote:PVC is to heavy and has thick walls.
You need a thinner walled plastic tube. Even ABS thin wall would be better.
Stupid question, can a metal body be used as an aerial of sorts?
Yes a metal body could be used if it is made for the antenna requirements.
I won't go into details yet until I complete more research on the transmitter antenna requirements.
- MrCrowley
- Moderator
- Posts: 10078
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
- Been thanked: 3 times
47.8mmdewey-1 wrote:MrC; What is the exact bore dimension in that new barrel?
As for the antenna, one could be made in to the fin section by running a wire along the thickness of each fin or the tail could be hollowed out and one of these spring like antennas used:
That's just off the top of my head, I'm sure when I've done some proper research better ideas will come to light.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
Shouldn't be a problem, pusher plate doesn't have to pass over the cross slide during manufacture, and the fins will be made separately.MrCrowley wrote:I guess 47mm/1.88" would be close enough, bit of tape or even grease could make it a better fit.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- RJB INDUSTRIES
- Specialist
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 5:49 pm
Sorry guys... Why you want apply this inside the projectile? What would it do on?
It is a crude tracker system.
A method using a directional receiver to locate the projectile.
A method using a directional receiver to locate the projectile.
- MrCrowley
- Moderator
- Posts: 10078
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
- Been thanked: 3 times
Thanks, I'll update it to the video, main page of this thread and instructable.
Edit: love the names you gave the components. Wish I had one of those printing label things so I could put "auto arm", "manual arm" and "master arm" on the project box
Edit: love the names you gave the components. Wish I had one of those printing label things so I could put "auto arm", "manual arm" and "master arm" on the project box