pneumatics vs combustion
- EatSpud!!!
- Private
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:25 am
i prefer the combustion gun over everything else the feeling you get when the cannon fires is the best but when you use the pneumatic it just doest sound right, sure it will probably go further but its just not the same without the boom!!
My combustion when it's in use does not get a boom, more like a dominant puff. It is alot weaker than my pneus and less reliable. I am a pyro to but it I want to here BOOM or see flame I couls just simply light my yard on fire being that no one around here cares, hell I could prolly blast off 1/4 sticks and have neighbors come over to play.
Whoever appeals to the law against his fellow man is either a fool or a coward.
Whoever cannot take care of themself without that law is both.
For a wounded man shall say to his assailant,
'If I live, I will kill you. If I die, You are forgiven.'
Such is the rule of honor.
Whoever cannot take care of themself without that law is both.
For a wounded man shall say to his assailant,
'If I live, I will kill you. If I die, You are forgiven.'
Such is the rule of honor.
- joannaardway
- Corporal 5
- Posts: 949
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:57 pm
- Location: SW Hertfordshire, England, UK.
I forgot to mention the higher reliability of pneumatics as a factor.
Besides, my local materials will stretch to low bore pneumatics, but I cannot get material to create a sensibly sized combustion.
Besides, I suppose I prefer low bore and smallish launchers, which are much harder to acheive with combustions.
And I like the extra complexity of the pneumatic.
Besides, my local materials will stretch to low bore pneumatics, but I cannot get material to create a sensibly sized combustion.
Besides, I suppose I prefer low bore and smallish launchers, which are much harder to acheive with combustions.
And I like the extra complexity of the pneumatic.