spudgun range, are we falling short?
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:21 am
Firstly, I apologise for opening with such a terrible and obvious pun.
This "rant" is prompted mostly by this post by MrCrowley - an experienced fabricator who has made some pretty impressive spudgun powerhouses - expressing amazement at the performance of a pneumatic launcher designed almost a century ago.
I've said this several times but I'll say it again, most of the members of this forum put a heck of a lot of effort in designing and building their launchers, then proceed to launch "anything that fits in the barrel". I enjoy this too, and it's undeniably one of the fun elements of the hobby. However, for those who enjoy pushing the envelope, it simply won't do.
It's understandable that one would be unwilling to put much effort into something that is going to be fired and will most likely perish, and I'm not suggesting "regular" ammunition should be so finely made, but it would be good to see some one-offs in the interest of exploring the performance potential of our creations.
I believe that with optimised projectiles, ranges well beyond one and even two miles are more than feasible, even with launchers that aren't necessarily the size of this monster.
Unfortunately I don't have the facility to shoot safely over such distances, and perhaps this is what prompts indignation at the fact that those with open acres sprawling at their feet do not take advantage of them.
I was contemplating sponsoring a contest for furthest distance but sadly, independently verifying claims would be a nightmare. Still, it would be interesting to see some attempts at distance records.
In terms of projectile design, I think the factors needed for good performance are well understood - a projectile should be light enough for high muzzle velocity, but should also have high sectional density and minimal drag. A discarding sabot design would seem ideal, but not obligatory.
One of the most challenging aspects though would be locating the fired projectile, some non-pyrotechnic ideas spring to mind:
- chemical or electrical light on the tail of the projectile and shooting at night: this might present safety hazard as it will be more difficult to determine that the shooting area is clear, as well as the need for the light source to survive impact with the ground
- a fine powder which would give a puff of smoke on impact
- gps tracker
- radio beacon as used to recover free flight model aircraft
- acoustic beacon
Any electronic solutions present their own hazards, frankly it would be better to use a device that relies on the projectile breaking in order to function as opposed to hoping it remains intact, especially if you're lobbing expensive tracking devices into the air.
Just my 0.02 euro cents, any thoughts?
This "rant" is prompted mostly by this post by MrCrowley - an experienced fabricator who has made some pretty impressive spudgun powerhouses - expressing amazement at the performance of a pneumatic launcher designed almost a century ago.
I've said this several times but I'll say it again, most of the members of this forum put a heck of a lot of effort in designing and building their launchers, then proceed to launch "anything that fits in the barrel". I enjoy this too, and it's undeniably one of the fun elements of the hobby. However, for those who enjoy pushing the envelope, it simply won't do.
It's understandable that one would be unwilling to put much effort into something that is going to be fired and will most likely perish, and I'm not suggesting "regular" ammunition should be so finely made, but it would be good to see some one-offs in the interest of exploring the performance potential of our creations.
I believe that with optimised projectiles, ranges well beyond one and even two miles are more than feasible, even with launchers that aren't necessarily the size of this monster.
Unfortunately I don't have the facility to shoot safely over such distances, and perhaps this is what prompts indignation at the fact that those with open acres sprawling at their feet do not take advantage of them.
I was contemplating sponsoring a contest for furthest distance but sadly, independently verifying claims would be a nightmare. Still, it would be interesting to see some attempts at distance records.
In terms of projectile design, I think the factors needed for good performance are well understood - a projectile should be light enough for high muzzle velocity, but should also have high sectional density and minimal drag. A discarding sabot design would seem ideal, but not obligatory.
One of the most challenging aspects though would be locating the fired projectile, some non-pyrotechnic ideas spring to mind:
- chemical or electrical light on the tail of the projectile and shooting at night: this might present safety hazard as it will be more difficult to determine that the shooting area is clear, as well as the need for the light source to survive impact with the ground
- a fine powder which would give a puff of smoke on impact
- gps tracker
- radio beacon as used to recover free flight model aircraft
- acoustic beacon
Any electronic solutions present their own hazards, frankly it would be better to use a device that relies on the projectile breaking in order to function as opposed to hoping it remains intact, especially if you're lobbing expensive tracking devices into the air.
Just my 0.02 euro cents, any thoughts?