I have a couple of ideas which i've shelved thinking "these are best saved for any future contest" hehermich732 wrote:Now, whose ready to start the next one ?
FINAL CONTEST - WINNERS!
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- origin unknown
- Corporal
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Searcy, Arkansas (college) and Memphis, TN (hometown)
Lets have a way different kind of contest next time. Like for a specific kind of gun e.g. Pneumatic, Combustion, Hybrid, or Mini. And no prizes for this next contest, just respect.
Ecclesiastes 1:9 - What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.
- mega_swordman
- Corporal
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 2:37 pm
- Location: Bay Area, California
- Contact:
A novel idea. I fully support the idea of a specific task. This way, we will get better tech on the subject, as well as the voting being a tad easier. Personally, I found it a bit difficult to choose between certain inventive designs. Also, if they all do the same thing (essentially) it will also appease all the people who just voted on looks.markfh11q wrote:I say we should make it even more specific... like whoever's got the first automatic combustion cannon wins... and further advances the hobby. 8)
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity." George S. Patton
I also agree that the next contest should not involve money. Perhaps some sort of title or designation could be added to the contest winner's title or something like that, and it would be removed when the winner of the next contest is declared. Its not really fair if PCGUY has to shell out $100 every contest, when in reality, most of us are just competing for respect anyways. Besides, because PCGUY runs the website, he should not have to pay money on top of the money to maintain the website. Besides, didn't the two contest winners donate their prize money to Spudfiles anyways? I noticed that the two winners both suddenly became "donating members". By the way, that was a really nice thing to do.
The only problem that I would have with a "specific" competition would be that it would get so many less submissions. I thought that this contest was great; there were many new ideas and many amazing cannons submitted. If we limited it to only one type of cannon, like an auto combustion, we run the risk (a HIGH risk) that only one or two (hopefully not zero) members would submit their creations. These two creations would be really cool nonetheless, but I think it would be better to have broad categories where there are many interesting submissions. Besides, if only one or two members submitted cannons, it wouldn't really be a "Spudfiles Competition"... more of a duel.
The only problem that I would have with a "specific" competition would be that it would get so many less submissions. I thought that this contest was great; there were many new ideas and many amazing cannons submitted. If we limited it to only one type of cannon, like an auto combustion, we run the risk (a HIGH risk) that only one or two (hopefully not zero) members would submit their creations. These two creations would be really cool nonetheless, but I think it would be better to have broad categories where there are many interesting submissions. Besides, if only one or two members submitted cannons, it wouldn't really be a "Spudfiles Competition"... more of a duel.
- mega_swordman
- Corporal
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 2:37 pm
- Location: Bay Area, California
- Contact:
An interesting point. I did in fact consider it, so here is my answer. How about specific tasks for each category (pneumatic, combustion, etc.). Also, with these tasks, what if they were broad such as improving the rate of fire on a combustion (like full auto). This way, there will be more entries, different fields, and many solutions to one problem. At the very least, if we have a inventive competition, there should be inventive entries, not pretty, yet normal cannons (no offence to anyone).
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity." George S. Patton
-
- Corporal 3
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 3:06 am
- Location: Oklahoma, USA
- Been thanked: 1 time
Maybe an entry fee and/or a donation pool could be used to gather the prizes in future competitions so it doesn't come out of PCGUY's pocket.
I think this contest was setup pretty well. Innovation is broad enough that it allows many entries, and it is something that can help advance the hobby on many fronts.
I donated $25 of my winnings, couldn't bring myself to turn down all of $100
I think this contest was setup pretty well. Innovation is broad enough that it allows many entries, and it is something that can help advance the hobby on many fronts.
I donated $25 of my winnings, couldn't bring myself to turn down all of $100
- jrrdw
- Moderator
- Posts: 6572
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:11 pm
- Location: Maryland
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
- Contact:
Clide your Avatar should say 1st contest winner to mark your win. If a donation pool is used, it should be totaly annomus, even between members. If no money is awarded, a spiecal trophy as a Avatar saying the members name and cannon name, untill the next contest, like above mentioned, i think it's a good idea. As for the contestents and new cannons, open class! Best cannon wins!!!
- origin unknown
- Corporal
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Searcy, Arkansas (college) and Memphis, TN (hometown)
Maybe we could have a contest to see who can make the best replica of a firearm, in spudgun form, and it has to be made all out of mainly ghetto materials.
Ecclesiastes 1:9 - What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.
- joannaardway
- Corporal 5
- Posts: 949
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:57 pm
- Location: SW Hertfordshire, England, UK.
Hmm, me and Ragnarok found (ok, I'll be honest, it was mostly him) this great way of making a full-auto combustion - and it's completely mechanical (no solenoid valves or anything like that), other than the spark control circuit.markfh11q wrote:I say we should make it even more specific... like whoever's got the first automatic combustion cannon wins... and further advances the hobby. 8)
You might be seeing the results soon, if a few design issues can be sorted and money can be sorted - including how to deal with the heat buildup.
Novacastrian: How about use whatever the heck you can get your hands on?
frankrede: Well then I guess it won't matter when you decide to drink bleach because your out of kool-aid.
...I'm sorry, but that made my year.
frankrede: Well then I guess it won't matter when you decide to drink bleach because your out of kool-aid.
...I'm sorry, but that made my year.
-
- First Sergeant 3
- Posts: 2400
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:12 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 10 times
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras nec placerat erat. Vivamus dapibus egestas nunc, at eleifend neque. Suspendisse potenti. Sed dictum lacus eu nisl pretium vehicula. Ut faucibus hendrerit nisi. Integer ultricies orci eu ultrices malesuada. Fusce id mauris risus. Suspendisse finibus ligula et nisl rutrum efficitur. Vestibulum posuere erat pellentesque ornare venenatis. Integer commodo fermentum tortor in pharetra. Proin scelerisque consectetur posuere. Vestibulum molestie augue ac nibh feugiat scelerisque. Sed aliquet a nunc in mattis.
Last edited by SpudBlaster15 on Wed Jul 14, 2021 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- mark.f
- Sergeant Major 4
- Posts: 3638
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 11:18 am
- Location: The Big Steezy
- Has thanked: 58 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
- Contact:
I find a lot of these dilemmas can be sorted out by taking a look at the modern combustion engine. Have you considered water cooling? A thin reservoir around the chamber, connected to a pump and then a coiling of 1/4" copper tubing in front of a fan, should be able to do the job. Keep in mind that it'd still get pretty hot, though. 8)joannaardway wrote: You might be seeing the results soon, if a few design issues can be sorted and money can be sorted - including how to deal with the heat buildup.
An incentive for taking the plunge and building such a device would be the prize. Maybe, if somebody builds a working system, they can then be compensated for their efforts as the prize. We might have to do like that competition earlier this year on the UKSGC forums, and the person with the best design gets the funds to build it...
- mark.f
- Sergeant Major 4
- Posts: 3638
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 11:18 am
- Location: The Big Steezy
- Has thanked: 58 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
- Contact:
Well, I'm not talking necessarily JUST an auto combustion. Pretty much any other specific flaming hoop that nobody's done yet that would require some ingenuity and design.