Have you seen the budget for technology development lately? Look for Research and Development. Number is in Millions.technology was expensive
http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:INTC&fstype=ii
One 13 week quarter; 2,401.00
Have you seen the budget for technology development lately? Look for Research and Development. Number is in Millions.technology was expensive
DYI wrote:Dewey may be overestimating the difficulty of making this part.
I am simply stating a $7.65 part modified is one hell of a lot cheaper than your $90 estimate.
Cut off, drill and tap and your done! 15 to 20 minutes tops.
In response to Dewey - you're not going to hold .002" on the external lengths without using machine tools.
I never said .002" tolerance. He can get away with .005"
:banghead: Why do you need such tight tolerances for a reducer anyway?PaperNinja wrote:I am worried though that the hole will be to large for the tap after I cut off the male threads.
PaperNinja wrote: I didn't realize how expensive a little part would be when I asked for it, if it would make it cheaper much larger tolerances would be acceptable, even up to .01"
I need it reasonably accurate, I'm going to use this to mount an air cylinder to use to reload a semi-auto gun. If the lengths aren't right, the loading piston won't press and seal against the hole in the barrel, greatly reducing power & efficiency.
I chose .002" because it is the tolerance I WILL need in another part I haven't written the plans for yet, and I figured I may as well have the tolerance uniform.