Idea for an Oxidiser
- TwitchTheAussie
- Corporal 5
- Posts: 980
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 3:23 am
I've been reading about nitrous being an oxidiser, as such I've been Nitrous has to be used with another gas so will these small tanks
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/POCKET-BIKE-NITR ... dZViewItem (sorry crap with links) be good for a mix with butane/propane in a cannon?
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/POCKET-BIKE-NITR ... dZViewItem (sorry crap with links) be good for a mix with butane/propane in a cannon?
-
- First Sergeant 3
- Posts: 2400
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:12 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 10 times
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras nec placerat erat. Vivamus dapibus egestas nunc, at eleifend neque. Suspendisse potenti. Sed dictum lacus eu nisl pretium vehicula. Ut faucibus hendrerit nisi. Integer ultricies orci eu ultrices malesuada. Fusce id mauris risus. Suspendisse finibus ligula et nisl rutrum efficitur. Vestibulum posuere erat pellentesque ornare venenatis. Integer commodo fermentum tortor in pharetra. Proin scelerisque consectetur posuere. Vestibulum molestie augue ac nibh feugiat scelerisque. Sed aliquet a nunc in mattis.
Last edited by SpudBlaster15 on Wed Jul 14, 2021 1:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- BC Pneumatics
- Sergeant
- Posts: 1053
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:55 pm
- Location: Fresno, CA
- Contact:
Well said SpudBlaster.
<a href="http://www.bcarms.com/"><img src="http://www.bcarms.com/images/store_logo.png" border="0"> </a>
N2O a liquid under pressure and becomes a gas when the pressure drops. So how would you meter it out precisely? So, you definitely can't just spray it in for a set amount of time. And due to the temperture and pressure fluxuation, you can't really use a regular metering pipe like with C3H8.
Maybe a meter pipe with a pipe prior to the regulator would work though. The N2O could be sprayed in, let it warm and stabilize, then meter it out. But, everything will have to be rated so some insane pressure to be safe.
Maybe a meter pipe with a pipe prior to the regulator would work though. The N2O could be sprayed in, let it warm and stabilize, then meter it out. But, everything will have to be rated so some insane pressure to be safe.
I'm weird, I know it, you don't need to tell me.
- willarddaniels
- Specialist 2
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:34 pm
- Location: Idaho
It would be simple to use a metered system, just like metered propane.
You can use oxygen as an oxidizer as well, it is probably cheaper. It is surely easier to get.
You can use oxygen as an oxidizer as well, it is probably cheaper. It is surely easier to get.
- BC Pneumatics
- Sergeant
- Posts: 1053
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:55 pm
- Location: Fresno, CA
- Contact:
So does propane, and at lower pressure than nitrous.pyrogeek wrote:N2O a liquid under pressure and becomes a gas when the pressure drops. So how would you meter it out precisely? So, you definitely can't just spray it in for a set amount of time. And due to the temperture and pressure fluxuation, you can't really use a regular metering pipe like with C3H8.
Maybe a meter pipe with a pipe prior to the regulator would work though. The N2O could be sprayed in, let it warm and stabilize, then meter it out. But, everything will have to be rated so some insane pressure to be safe.
<a href="http://www.bcarms.com/"><img src="http://www.bcarms.com/images/store_logo.png" border="0"> </a>
-
- Corporal 5
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:54 pm
I don't see why nitrous would have an advantage over pure oxygen
Movie dialogue: "The good die first."
Tom: "But most of us are morally ambiguous, which explains our random dying
patterns."
Tom: "But most of us are morally ambiguous, which explains our random dying
patterns."
- BC Pneumatics
- Sergeant
- Posts: 1053
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:55 pm
- Location: Fresno, CA
- Contact:
Because it won't work as well. the advantage being that you don't fragment your chamber.
<a href="http://www.bcarms.com/"><img src="http://www.bcarms.com/images/store_logo.png" border="0"> </a>
- boilingleadbath
- Staff Sergeant 2
- Posts: 1635
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:35 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Here's an interesting analysis:
10N2O + C3H8 -> 3CO2 + 4H2O + 10N2
...or 11 mol -> 17 mol
5O2 + C3H8 -> 3CO2 + 4H2O
or 6 mol -> 7 mol
So, unless the nitros-propane burns alot cooler than the oxygen-propane (like more than 30% cooler), the nitros-propane will acctualy produce more pressure.
Have you guys seen any flame temperature stats for this or similar reactions?
(the nitros-propane, that is - O2-propane stats are everywhere)
...Thanks to SpudBlaster and GasEq, we have the relevent data.
3200*C for N2O-propane
3400*C for O2-propane
which means that the N2O provides a significantly higher pressure than the O2.
10N2O + C3H8 -> 3CO2 + 4H2O + 10N2
...or 11 mol -> 17 mol
5O2 + C3H8 -> 3CO2 + 4H2O
or 6 mol -> 7 mol
So, unless the nitros-propane burns alot cooler than the oxygen-propane (like more than 30% cooler), the nitros-propane will acctualy produce more pressure.
Have you guys seen any flame temperature stats for this or similar reactions?
(the nitros-propane, that is - O2-propane stats are everywhere)
...Thanks to SpudBlaster and GasEq, we have the relevent data.
3200*C for N2O-propane
3400*C for O2-propane
which means that the N2O provides a significantly higher pressure than the O2.
- BC Pneumatics
- Sergeant
- Posts: 1053
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:55 pm
- Location: Fresno, CA
- Contact:
10N2O + C3H8 -> 3CO2 + 4H2O + 10N2
-3039KJ/mol
5O2 + C3H8 -> 3CO2 + 4H2O
-2219KJ/mol
This means that the lower reaction is only about 73% as energetic as the first. You will have to excuse my prior screw up, I was thinking that formation of N20 had a negative enthalpy value.
Does anyone have the flamefront acceleration for these reactions?
-3039KJ/mol
5O2 + C3H8 -> 3CO2 + 4H2O
-2219KJ/mol
This means that the lower reaction is only about 73% as energetic as the first. You will have to excuse my prior screw up, I was thinking that formation of N20 had a negative enthalpy value.
Does anyone have the flamefront acceleration for these reactions?
<a href="http://www.bcarms.com/"><img src="http://www.bcarms.com/images/store_logo.png" border="0"> </a>
- joannaardway
- Corporal 5
- Posts: 949
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:57 pm
- Location: SW Hertfordshire, England, UK.
That's not the problem. - you can fit less moles of the Nitrous reaction into a chamber. You need 11 units for a full reaction, whereas the C3H8/O2 only needs 6 units.
Adjusting for that factor, the energies involved are actually 33% higher for the Propane/O2 than the Propane/N2O.
But the true advantage is that nitrous is a lot easier to store than oxygen. Nitrous is stored as a liquid, but oxygen is stored as a gas at about 3000 psi.
Adjusting for that factor, the energies involved are actually 33% higher for the Propane/O2 than the Propane/N2O.
But the true advantage is that nitrous is a lot easier to store than oxygen. Nitrous is stored as a liquid, but oxygen is stored as a gas at about 3000 psi.
Novacastrian: How about use whatever the heck you can get your hands on?
frankrede: Well then I guess it won't matter when you decide to drink bleach because your out of kool-aid.
...I'm sorry, but that made my year.
frankrede: Well then I guess it won't matter when you decide to drink bleach because your out of kool-aid.
...I'm sorry, but that made my year.
- BC Pneumatics
- Sergeant
- Posts: 1053
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:55 pm
- Location: Fresno, CA
- Contact:
joannaardway, back to high school chemistry for you.
That is just the balanced equation, and only shows the proportions you need. The truth is, gases at equal pressure and equal volume, contain the same number of moles. Thank you Avogadro.
That is just the balanced equation, and only shows the proportions you need. The truth is, gases at equal pressure and equal volume, contain the same number of moles. Thank you Avogadro.
<a href="http://www.bcarms.com/"><img src="http://www.bcarms.com/images/store_logo.png" border="0"> </a>
- joannaardway
- Corporal 5
- Posts: 949
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:57 pm
- Location: SW Hertfordshire, England, UK.
No - I'm in "high school chemistry" at the moment (well, not right now)
Now, to turn your own argument back against you, here's the numbers and figures. Let's say a chamber is 24 litres (1 mole of gas at RTP).
For the Nitrous/Propane Reaction, 10/11ths (21.8L) of that is Nitrous, and 1/11th (2.2L) of that is Propane.
For the Oxygen/Propane reaction, 5/6ths (20L) is Oxygen, and 1/6th (4L)is propane.
So for Nitrous/Propane:
We have 1/11th of a mole of propane - (Molar enthalpy change of formation -104.5 kJ a mole) - so that's 9.5 kJ of energy needed to break the bonds.
Also the 10/11ths of N2O (Molar enthalpy change of formation +82 kJ a mole) - We gain 74.5 kJ here.
The energy gained by forming the 3/11ths of CO2 (Molar enthalpy change of formation -393.5 kJ a mole) is 107.3 kJ, and the formation of the 4/11ths of water (Molar enthalpy change of formation -142.9 kJ a mole) produces 51.9 kJ.
And of course, Nitrogen is an element so it has no Molar enthalpy change of formation.
Summing that the total energy change gives ( (-107.3-51.9) - (9.5 + 74.5)) = -224.2 kJ of energy from a 24L chamber. (For those not in the know the little minus sign means it's exothermic - not negative energy)
Doing the same for Oxygen:
Break up of 1/6th of a mole of propane: 17.4 kJ loss
Production of 3/6th (1/2) of a mole of CO2: 196.8 kJ gain
Production of 4/6th (2/3) of a mole of H2O: 95.3 kJ gain.
Summing that, we get -274.7 kJ of energy from a 24 L chamber.
Putting those figures alongside each other:
-224.2 kJ from Nitrous-Propane
-274.7 kJ from Propane/O2 (significantly better)
So, for a chamber of a set size, Oxygen/Propane owns Nitrous-Propane.
Don't assume that I'm thick. I'm slap bang in the middle of an A-level chemistry course, and this is top-billing stuff.
Now, to turn your own argument back against you, here's the numbers and figures. Let's say a chamber is 24 litres (1 mole of gas at RTP).
For the Nitrous/Propane Reaction, 10/11ths (21.8L) of that is Nitrous, and 1/11th (2.2L) of that is Propane.
For the Oxygen/Propane reaction, 5/6ths (20L) is Oxygen, and 1/6th (4L)is propane.
So for Nitrous/Propane:
We have 1/11th of a mole of propane - (Molar enthalpy change of formation -104.5 kJ a mole) - so that's 9.5 kJ of energy needed to break the bonds.
Also the 10/11ths of N2O (Molar enthalpy change of formation +82 kJ a mole) - We gain 74.5 kJ here.
The energy gained by forming the 3/11ths of CO2 (Molar enthalpy change of formation -393.5 kJ a mole) is 107.3 kJ, and the formation of the 4/11ths of water (Molar enthalpy change of formation -142.9 kJ a mole) produces 51.9 kJ.
And of course, Nitrogen is an element so it has no Molar enthalpy change of formation.
Summing that the total energy change gives ( (-107.3-51.9) - (9.5 + 74.5)) = -224.2 kJ of energy from a 24L chamber. (For those not in the know the little minus sign means it's exothermic - not negative energy)
Doing the same for Oxygen:
Break up of 1/6th of a mole of propane: 17.4 kJ loss
Production of 3/6th (1/2) of a mole of CO2: 196.8 kJ gain
Production of 4/6th (2/3) of a mole of H2O: 95.3 kJ gain.
Summing that, we get -274.7 kJ of energy from a 24 L chamber.
Putting those figures alongside each other:
-224.2 kJ from Nitrous-Propane
-274.7 kJ from Propane/O2 (significantly better)
So, for a chamber of a set size, Oxygen/Propane owns Nitrous-Propane.
Don't assume that I'm thick. I'm slap bang in the middle of an A-level chemistry course, and this is top-billing stuff.
Novacastrian: How about use whatever the heck you can get your hands on?
frankrede: Well then I guess it won't matter when you decide to drink bleach because your out of kool-aid.
...I'm sorry, but that made my year.
frankrede: Well then I guess it won't matter when you decide to drink bleach because your out of kool-aid.
...I'm sorry, but that made my year.