combustion coxial
- jimmy101
- Sergeant Major
- Posts: 3199
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am
- Location: Greenwood, Indiana
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
- Contact:
Willard:
I agree completely, different builders have different goals. Clever design is always of interest.
I just try to correct misconceptions that many people post on this site.
For example, you said "Any additional heat loss is to the interior fo the gun, thus minimizing the effect." Sorry, but that is not true. Where the heat is lost to is irrelevant. Lost is lost. The high heat capacity and high mass of the pvc will suck a tremendous amount of energy out of the low heat capacity, low mass, but high temperature, combustion gases.
Or, "Use a spark strip," spark strips are OK but not very effective. It takes two sparks on a strip to equal one spark on the central axis of the chamber. And, the sparks must be spaced roughly the chamber diameter apart for the multiple sparks to make much difference.
So, back to my original post, a coaxial design is interesting but it basicly sucks.
I agree completely, different builders have different goals. Clever design is always of interest.
I just try to correct misconceptions that many people post on this site.
For example, you said "Any additional heat loss is to the interior fo the gun, thus minimizing the effect." Sorry, but that is not true. Where the heat is lost to is irrelevant. Lost is lost. The high heat capacity and high mass of the pvc will suck a tremendous amount of energy out of the low heat capacity, low mass, but high temperature, combustion gases.
Or, "Use a spark strip," spark strips are OK but not very effective. It takes two sparks on a strip to equal one spark on the central axis of the chamber. And, the sparks must be spaced roughly the chamber diameter apart for the multiple sparks to make much difference.
So, back to my original post, a coaxial design is interesting but it basicly sucks.
hence the burst disk on the diagram i showedwillarddaniels wrote:You can, you just need to use a compression spring instead of trying to use a pneumatically pressurized piston. The problem comes in trying to release the pilot at the same moment moment of combustion... get it wrong and you just made a bomb.could you make a coaxial hybrid? a regular piston valve but instead of droping the pressure on the pilot side increase the pressure on the chamber side (combustion) or have a simultaneous ignition pilot valve release
"Those who are different change the world. Those who are the same keep it that way"
- spudthug
- Corporal 5
- Posts: 936
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:02 pm
- Location: johnsonburg, Pa USA
- Contact:
ok so back to the being ok for combustion part...so u guys dont think this will blow up and kill me??
edit: i plan on using propane...
edit 2...ok since im bored ill go try it..if i die someone who lives in pa search for me and take my cannons...take care of them for me mmkay
edit: i plan on using propane...
edit 2...ok since im bored ill go try it..if i die someone who lives in pa search for me and take my cannons...take care of them for me mmkay
4" piston valved cannon-half done..( i spilt my cement...)
Hybrid- 75% done. need to build propane holder and drill/tap sparkplug hole..
Hybrid- 75% done. need to build propane holder and drill/tap sparkplug hole..
-
- First Sergeant 3
- Posts: 2400
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:12 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 10 times
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras nec placerat erat. Vivamus dapibus egestas nunc, at eleifend neque. Suspendisse potenti. Sed dictum lacus eu nisl pretium vehicula. Ut faucibus hendrerit nisi. Integer ultricies orci eu ultrices malesuada. Fusce id mauris risus. Suspendisse finibus ligula et nisl rutrum efficitur. Vestibulum posuere erat pellentesque ornare venenatis. Integer commodo fermentum tortor in pharetra. Proin scelerisque consectetur posuere. Vestibulum molestie augue ac nibh feugiat scelerisque. Sed aliquet a nunc in mattis.
Last edited by SpudBlaster15 on Wed Jul 14, 2021 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- spudthug
- Corporal 5
- Posts: 936
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:02 pm
- Location: johnsonburg, Pa USA
- Contact:
actually i posted like 15 mins ago...and it works but since i am not using metere propane how many seconds of propane should i use??? ill go try again with more propane and post back
omg this thing sucks...i used right guard i used propane and the potato comes out like "phwoop" and goes like 20 feet....what is wrong??
omg this thing sucks...i used right guard i used propane and the potato comes out like "phwoop" and goes like 20 feet....what is wrong??
4" piston valved cannon-half done..( i spilt my cement...)
Hybrid- 75% done. need to build propane holder and drill/tap sparkplug hole..
Hybrid- 75% done. need to build propane holder and drill/tap sparkplug hole..
Wrong mix. Happend with my cannon once too, my friends almost peeeeed themselves. On my cannon I use 30-40 in warm weather and 50-60 when its cold. But it really depends on the size of your gun. Id say start at 15-20 seconds and then go up by 5 seconds. Find the sweet spot and rember it, at least tahts how I did it. Good luck!
- boilingleadbath
- Staff Sergeant 2
- Posts: 1635
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:35 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania, USA
...I wonder if putting lengthwise beads on the outside of the barrel would increase performance enough to be noticed. (think schelkin spiral)
Regardless, I think we have two contradicting factors with one's standard coaxial launcher:
1) Increased chamber volume
2) Increased heat loss and increased time of combustion - discounting going overboard on the ignition points.
As such, I'm not certain it's as strait forwards as "coaxials won't preform as well".
Regardless, I think we have two contradicting factors with one's standard coaxial launcher:
1) Increased chamber volume
2) Increased heat loss and increased time of combustion - discounting going overboard on the ignition points.
As such, I'm not certain it's as strait forwards as "coaxials won't preform as well".
-
- First Sergeant 3
- Posts: 2400
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:12 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 10 times
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras nec placerat erat. Vivamus dapibus egestas nunc, at eleifend neque. Suspendisse potenti. Sed dictum lacus eu nisl pretium vehicula. Ut faucibus hendrerit nisi. Integer ultricies orci eu ultrices malesuada. Fusce id mauris risus. Suspendisse finibus ligula et nisl rutrum efficitur. Vestibulum posuere erat pellentesque ornare venenatis. Integer commodo fermentum tortor in pharetra. Proin scelerisque consectetur posuere. Vestibulum molestie augue ac nibh feugiat scelerisque. Sed aliquet a nunc in mattis.
Last edited by SpudBlaster15 on Wed Jul 14, 2021 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- BC Pneumatics
- Sergeant
- Posts: 1053
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:55 pm
- Location: Fresno, CA
- Contact:
A step back? That is like saying a bolt action is a 'step back' form a semi auto. Both have there places. Performance isn't always everything.
The best place of ignition is as far from the barrel as possible, so the flamefront can accelerate, as far as anyone has ever been able to show. the whole 'put it in the middle some more is burning' has never been proven as effective. (Most people seem to think the opposite, it hurts performance.
The best place of ignition is as far from the barrel as possible, so the flamefront can accelerate, as far as anyone has ever been able to show. the whole 'put it in the middle some more is burning' has never been proven as effective. (Most people seem to think the opposite, it hurts performance.
<a href="http://www.bcarms.com/"><img src="http://www.bcarms.com/images/store_logo.png" border="0"> </a>
- boilingleadbath
- Staff Sergeant 2
- Posts: 1635
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:35 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania, USA
I was assuming that the standard coaxial has the chamber extend for most of the length of the barrel, in which case you'd normally have a pretty high ratio.
Hmmm....
Perhaps one could use the small barrel-chamber gap to our advantage in the coaxial design, by ribbing the barrel? (again, think schelkin spiral)
This idea should be really f'ing scary to anyone who knew what a schelkin spiral is designed to do, and what 4' of schelkin spiral is capable of, but perhaps one could make a only 'slightly coaxial' chamber with, say, 6" of 'submerged' ribbed barrel?
With the obvious caveat that it is never, <i>ever</i>, to be used with enriched or sensitive fuel-air mixtures.
Hmmm....
Perhaps one could use the small barrel-chamber gap to our advantage in the coaxial design, by ribbing the barrel? (again, think schelkin spiral)
This idea should be really f'ing scary to anyone who knew what a schelkin spiral is designed to do, and what 4' of schelkin spiral is capable of, but perhaps one could make a only 'slightly coaxial' chamber with, say, 6" of 'submerged' ribbed barrel?
With the obvious caveat that it is never, <i>ever</i>, to be used with enriched or sensitive fuel-air mixtures.
- frankrede
- Sergeant Major 2
- Posts: 3220
- Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:47 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
The barrel, if used in used in a hybrid mixture would collapse on itself from the pressure. SCH-80 pvc actually is weaker when pressure is coming from the exterior.
Current project: Afghanistan deployment
-
- First Sergeant 3
- Posts: 2400
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:12 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 10 times
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras nec placerat erat. Vivamus dapibus egestas nunc, at eleifend neque. Suspendisse potenti. Sed dictum lacus eu nisl pretium vehicula. Ut faucibus hendrerit nisi. Integer ultricies orci eu ultrices malesuada. Fusce id mauris risus. Suspendisse finibus ligula et nisl rutrum efficitur. Vestibulum posuere erat pellentesque ornare venenatis. Integer commodo fermentum tortor in pharetra. Proin scelerisque consectetur posuere. Vestibulum molestie augue ac nibh feugiat scelerisque. Sed aliquet a nunc in mattis.
Last edited by SpudBlaster15 on Wed Jul 14, 2021 3:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- LucyInTheSky
- Specialist 2
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 11:46 am
For the hybrid idea, you could just make the piolet abit larger and only fill it to about 5psi higher than the pressure of the mix. This way the piston will still be able to move back as it will just compress the air behind it until it is equal with the combustion at the front so it wont be a bomb, plus it is like a self setting bust disc.
If your getting chased off a police dog, try not to run through a tunnel then onto a small see-saw then through a ring of fire. They are trained for that!