The first thing I'm wondering about concerns the diameter of barrels. 4" chambers with 2" barrels and 3" chambers with 1.5" barrels seem to be the most popular choices, but does one get better performance than the other assuming chamber:barrel ratios are equal, or will the two guns have almost the same performance? What about 4" chambers with 1.5" barrels and other combinations?
This leads into my next question. In the Burnt Latke test data for russets launched from a 1.5" barrel, the best C:B ratio appears to be around .7:1 using metered propane as the fuel. This is mentioned a lot on the forums, but would this ratio also be optimal using good spray & pray fuels such as Right Guard or Axe assuming you have a good fuel to air mix? (This might be impossible to truly test, but does anyone have some idea?)
My last question is about triggers. I already made one spud gun, but the problem is that the BBQ igniter is only held in place by electrical tape making it hard to press the button without quickly ruining the tape holding it in place. What are some better ways to mount the trigger on the gun?
Thanks for your help
A few simple things I need clarification on
4'' chamber with 1.5'' barrel will work just fine. it will theoreticly give you more speed.
for spray and pray combustions, about .9:1 or 1:1 is good.
.7:1 is as small as it can be to use up all the energy. any smaller it will waste energy and any bigger and it will loose energy.
i personally like making them with ablut .9:1 for the extra bang.
for spray and pray combustions, about .9:1 or 1:1 is good.
.7:1 is as small as it can be to use up all the energy. any smaller it will waste energy and any bigger and it will loose energy.
i personally like making them with ablut .9:1 for the extra bang.
"physics, gravity, and law enforcement are the only things that prevent me from operating at my full potential" - not sure, but i like the quote
you know you are not an engineer if you have to remind yourself "left loosy righty tighty"
you know you are not an engineer if you have to remind yourself "left loosy righty tighty"
You would usually get less muzzle energy from a smaller i.d. barrel, people make there choices based on practicality i.e. they don't want to carry around a 3 metre barrel.
You could try resin to fix your igniter to your gun- or good old zip ties, you know the ones cops use as handcuffs en masse.
Peace
Scotty
Damn you Hi- just beat me!
You could try resin to fix your igniter to your gun- or good old zip ties, you know the ones cops use as handcuffs en masse.
Peace
Scotty
Damn you Hi- just beat me!
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26204
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 572 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
A 2" barrel has a calibre that's 177% the area of a 1.5" barrel, meaning that for a given barrel length and C:B ratio, the 2" barrel should be more powerful in the same proportion.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Hmmm, ok, I'm still a bit confused. Perhaps examples will help.
Say you have 2 guns with 4" x 12" chambers. Both have barrels 48" long, but one is 2" wide and the other is 1.5" wide. Obviously the gun with the thicker barrel has a more efficient C:B ratio, but would the gun with a 1.5" barrel shoot farther and faster because gas would be forced more quickly down the barrel and be expected to shoot even faster if the barrel length is increased?
Of course, making an efficient C:B ratio with this size chamber and a 1.5" pipe could result in a ridiculously long barrel.
Say you have 2 guns with 4" x 12" chambers. Both have barrels 48" long, but one is 2" wide and the other is 1.5" wide. Obviously the gun with the thicker barrel has a more efficient C:B ratio, but would the gun with a 1.5" barrel shoot farther and faster because gas would be forced more quickly down the barrel and be expected to shoot even faster if the barrel length is increased?
Of course, making an efficient C:B ratio with this size chamber and a 1.5" pipe could result in a ridiculously long barrel.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26204
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 572 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
You need to define what you want in terms of power - a large heavy projectile will have more energy than a small fast one, but by virtue of its velocity and smaller surface area, the latter will penetrate better, and due to its flatter trajectory, be easier to shoot accurately.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- jimmy101
- Sergeant Major
- Posts: 3199
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am
- Location: Greenwood, Indiana
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
- Contact:
The optimal CB ratio for a gun is pretty independent of the fuel. Besides, RightGaurd, Axe etc are really just propane anyway (there is only a small percentage of other things in most spray cans). So, if "you have a good fuel to air mix" (you have a chamber fan for example) then the optimal CB is still goinig to be in the 0.7~0.9 range.niglch wrote:In the Burnt Latke test data for russets launched from a 1.5" barrel, the best C:B ratio appears to be around .7:1 using metered propane as the fuel. This is mentioned a lot on the forums, but would this ratio also be optimal using good spray & pray fuels such as Right Guard or Axe assuming you have a good fuel to air mix? (This might be impossible to truly test, but does anyone have some idea?)
Try to fit your piezo sparker into various sizes of PVC pipe and fittings. IIRC, my lighter fits pretty snuggly in 1/2" (3/4"?) T fitting. Get a couple of end caps and pipe and make a handle. The grip is the vertical of the T. Strap the top of the T to your gun with a pair of big-ass hose clamps. Pass the sparker wires out the back of the T and on to your gaps.niglch wrote:My last question is about triggers. I already made one spud gun, but the problem is that the BBQ igniter is only held in place by electrical tape making it hard to press the button without quickly ruining the tape holding it in place. What are some better ways to mount the trigger on the gun?
You might think that the T would want to roll against the chamber but it really doesn't. If you want, you can always add a dab of PVC between the fittings on the handle and the chamber.
By power I meant range and speed. I want a gun that will shoot as far as possible (while of course still being safe to fire). I'm not very concerned about the actual size or weight of the projectile.jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:You need to define what you want in terms of power - a large heavy projectile will have more energy than a small fast one, but by virtue of its velocity and smaller surface area, the latter will penetrate better, and due to its flatter trajectory, be easier to shoot accurately.
Speed and range is different to muzzle energy.
A 1gram projectile at a range of say 10 metres might hit the target with an energy of 5 joules and a velocity of 300fps, A 10 gram projectile might hit with 25 joules and velocity of 100fps. (just as an example)
Max range comes with ammo that is weighted properly for YOUR guns power, you have to find a "happy medium".
Peace
Scotty
A 1gram projectile at a range of say 10 metres might hit the target with an energy of 5 joules and a velocity of 300fps, A 10 gram projectile might hit with 25 joules and velocity of 100fps. (just as an example)
Max range comes with ammo that is weighted properly for YOUR guns power, you have to find a "happy medium".
Peace
Scotty
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26204
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 572 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
In that case, I would go for a smaller calibre long barrel - and something other than potatoes as ammunitionniglch wrote:By power I meant range and speed. I want a gun that will shoot as far as possible (while of course still being safe to fire). I'm not very concerned about the actual size or weight of the projectile.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life