massive chamber and small barrel diameter

Boom! The classic potato gun harnesses the combustion of flammable vapor. Show us your combustion spud gun and discuss fuels, ratios, safety, ignition systems, tools, and more.
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26204
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 572 times
Been thanked: 345 times

Donating Members

Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:27 am

What would happen if you had a large (several litres) chamber that only had a small vent to exhaust out of? I'm thinking (if the word really applies) combustion burst fire BBMG here :D

Would the hot gasses have time to cool and lose pressure?
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
Skywalker
Specialist
Specialist
United States of America
Posts: 194
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 7:22 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Mon Nov 10, 2008 9:37 am

Yeah, it would work, but I doubt you'd get the same power equivalent out as you would if you shot a single large projectile. I haven't done the math, but you do loose heat energy from the combustion gasses the longer they stay in the chamber. I think it's "worth a shot" though, not very complicated!
User avatar
starman
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
United States of America
Posts: 3027
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:45 am
Location: Simpsonville, SC

Donating Members

Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:34 am

jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:What would happen if you had a large (several litres) chamber that only had a small vent to exhaust out of? I'm thinking (if the word really applies) combustion burst fire BBMG here :D

Would the hot gasses have time to cool and lose pressure?
Why would you want such a lopsidedly large chamber size for a BB sized barrel?
User avatar
Ragnarok
Captain
Captain
Posts: 5401
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:23 am
Location: The UK

Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:49 am

I have severe doubts this would work. The combustion gases lose their temperature very fast - they have little mass compared to the walls, grammes compared to kilos.

Think in terms of a completely closed chamber. The combustion pressure fast dwindles to nothing, you're not left with a chamber full of any more than mildly warm gases after that first instant.

You might get quarter second bursts, but I wouldn't hold out for any more than that.
After about half a second, the temperature of the gases will have dropped back so far that you won't be able to do anything with them.
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
User avatar
jimmy101
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
United States of America
Posts: 3199
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am
Location: Greenwood, Indiana
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 17 times
Contact:

Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:04 pm

Like Ragnarok said, the heat loss is too fast. For a typical size closed chamber the pressure will drop by 50% in 0.1 to 0.2 seconds. By one second after igntion the chamber pressure is basically back to atmospheric.
(From here.)
Image
User avatar
psycix
Sergeant Major 4
Sergeant Major 4
Posts: 3684
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:12 am
Location: The Netherlands

Donating Members

Mon Nov 10, 2008 2:14 pm

But it will surely spit out a few BB's before the pressure drops to zero.
Till the day I'm dieing, I'll keep them spuddies flying, 'cause I can!

Spudfiles steam group, join!
User avatar
FishBoy
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 575
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 5:51 am

Mon Nov 10, 2008 3:49 pm

I think it should work, the question is how long of a burst would it give.
I think if you set it up with a vortex block or cap it should work decently, you would just obviously have to refuel it after each burst. For fast refueling I would use pre-metered propane "cartridges" similar to what someone did when they made the triple thunder advanced combustion guns.
"You polish a turd, it's still a turd"

Remember DYI!!!
User avatar
jimmy101
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
United States of America
Posts: 3199
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am
Location: Greenwood, Indiana
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 17 times
Contact:

Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:22 pm

psycix wrote:But it will surely spit out a few BB's before the pressure drops to zero.
"A few" being the important phase. Lets see, at 50 RPS (typical BBMG). Figure you have decent pressure for 100mS followed by another couple hundred mS as the pressure drops down. That'll give 5 rounds at high pressure. Small ID of the barrel is going to suck heat out of the gas flow like crazy, so figure you might get another 10 or so BBs before the pressures gone.

Be interesting to see if it is worth it. Off hand I would think just putting 50 BBs in a sabot and firing'm like a shotgun shell would be easier.
Image
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26204
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 572 times
Been thanked: 345 times

Donating Members

Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:41 pm

jimmy101 wrote:Be interesting to see if it is worth it. Off hand I would think just putting 50 BBs in a sabot and firing'm like a shotgun shell would be easier.
That's basically the conclusion I reached ;)
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
Ragnarok
Captain
Captain
Posts: 5401
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:23 am
Location: The UK

Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:02 pm

jimmy101 wrote:Off hand I would think just putting 50 BBs in a sabot and firing'm like a shotgun shell would be easier.
I've been longing to do this for quite some time. I was thinking something like skeet/clay pigeon shooting with two launchers, one with BBs, one with water balloons...
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
Post Reply