multiple chambers
For combustion guns you'd better have one big chamber instead of two small ones. This is because you would need a spark gap in each chamber, while one chamber with multiple would be more effective.
Also connecting the multiple chambers will make the gun unnecessary complex and may result in power loss.
A chamber with the same length as the diameter * the number of sparkgaps will theoretically be the best option when choosing between multiple chambers with the same volume.
Also connecting the multiple chambers will make the gun unnecessary complex and may result in power loss.
A chamber with the same length as the diameter * the number of sparkgaps will theoretically be the best option when choosing between multiple chambers with the same volume.
- jimmy101
- Sergeant Major
- Posts: 3199
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am
- Location: Greenwood, Indiana
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
- Contact:
The other problem with multiple chambers versus a siingle chamber is that you increase the surface area to volume ratio. That means you'll loose more energy to heat loss.
- rcman50166
- Corporal 2
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:11 pm
- Location: Bethel, CT
- Contact:
However having multiple chambers will increase the life expectancy of the gun. An example is my "General". It has two 4 inch chambers which is the equivalent of a single chamber of around 5 and a half inches. Pipe at that size would get me worried about structural failure when it is fired at Sch 40. But I needed the power to propel projectiles out of a 3 inch bore barrel. So I had to use two chambers instead of one.
That just depends on the wall thickness vs the pipe diameter rcman.
If the wall thickness increases proportionally, there is nothing wrong with larger diameter pipe.
If the wall thickness increases proportionally, there is nothing wrong with larger diameter pipe.
- rcman50166
- Corporal 2
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:11 pm
- Location: Bethel, CT
- Contact:
yes that is true, but i don't recall any pipe that does that. With the pipe I'm talking about the pressure rating goes down. It's been a while but i think it's around 60 psi for 6 inch dia PVC while it goes up as the diameter gets smaller.
SCH40 (or any other SCH) means that the wall thickness stays the same, and yes, in that case, the pressure rating of larger pipes is lower.
However, SDR pipe is meant to keep the same wall:dia ratio. SDR=Standard dimension ratio.
Now you know a pipe that does that.
However, SDR pipe is meant to keep the same wall:dia ratio. SDR=Standard dimension ratio.
Now you know a pipe that does that.
- rcman50166
- Corporal 2
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:11 pm
- Location: Bethel, CT
- Contact:
Hmm.. curious, do they sell SDR at places like home depot or lowes or a major home improvement chain like that?
Yes, lately there has been .75", 1", and 1.25" SDR being sold at my local Lowes and Home Depot...no 1.5" unfortunately...pushing it as a cheaper alternative to sched 40, and 200 psi rating is still plenty for most house hold uses.rcman50166 wrote:Hmm.. curious, do they sell SDR at places like home depot or lowes or a major home improvement chain like that?
I found it a little thinnish for real plumbing work.
- rcman50166
- Corporal 2
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:11 pm
- Location: Bethel, CT
- Contact:
So I guess they don't sell larger sizes, cause its the larger stuff that we're after. Like 4-6" ID pipe
Afraid that's not actually true. The wall thickness of SCH 40 roughly doubles between 1/2" and 3" sizes:psycix wrote:SCH40 (or any other SCH) means that the wall thickness stays the same, and yes, in that case, the pressure rating of larger pipes is lower.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominal_Pipe_Size
As you can tell, other sizes do the same.
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
Go metal then.rcman50166 wrote:So I guess they don't sell larger sizes, cause its the larger stuff that we're after. Like 4-6" ID pipe