marble autocannon
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
Herewith the latest prototype in my series of pop-off auto launchers.
First, some target videos:
[youtube][/youtube]
The smileys look a bit more worried these days
[youtube][/youtube]
Another cardboard smiley gets perforated
[youtube][/youtube]
A piece of 1/4" plywood, as you can see power isn't exactly amazing.
The heart of the system is a modified 1 inch pop-off valve coupled to a simple tee/detent magazine. I think the low power can be attributed to the fact that the pop-off operates at a maximum of 3 bar (circa 45 psi) and for a relatively short interval, but still, nice to see it operate quite reliably
Here's there complete setup:
First, some target videos:
[youtube][/youtube]
The smileys look a bit more worried these days
[youtube][/youtube]
Another cardboard smiley gets perforated
[youtube][/youtube]
A piece of 1/4" plywood, as you can see power isn't exactly amazing.
The heart of the system is a modified 1 inch pop-off valve coupled to a simple tee/detent magazine. I think the low power can be attributed to the fact that the pop-off operates at a maximum of 3 bar (circa 45 psi) and for a relatively short interval, but still, nice to see it operate quite reliably
Here's there complete setup:
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Nice. Not too powerful, but I still wouldn't want to be shot by it.
I have to say, though , that a EV+popoff seems much more powerful, as well as compact. Are there any advantages of this, beyond having 1 less part.
I have to say, though , that a EV+popoff seems much more powerful, as well as compact. Are there any advantages of this, beyond having 1 less part.
POLAND_SPUD wrote:even if there was no link I'd know it's a bot because of female name
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
I'm not even using it at full pressure, the problem is that for it to pop, there is a minimum level of flow (otherwise it will just hiss) and since this beast has 1" porting, the flow requirement is too high for my compressor to supply.JDP12 wrote:Very nice, I think it's coming along good. Have you given any thought to possibly gutting and modifying the popoff to pop at higher pressure?
If you're talking aboutthis one, psycix is running that at 30 bar, that's 10 times the maximum rating of my valve and for reasons pointed out above I'm actually running much lower than that, I doubt it's popping at more than 20 psi (though I'm feeding 110 psi into the chamber).ramses wrote:I have to say, though , that a EV+popoff seems much more powerful, as well as compact. Are there any advantages of this, beyond having 1 less part.
The advantage of this system is that it's more efficient as all the air goes through the barrel, it needs to be tuned in terms of spring strength and chamber flow but this is also true of a QEV/popoff system. It really doesn't get much simpler as a constant flow auto valve, unless you use the projectiles as a "valve".
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- POLAND_SPUD
- Captain
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 4:43 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
well it is impressive anyway
I don't quite get it... couldn't you simply replace the spring with a stronger one ??
I don't quite get it... couldn't you simply replace the spring with a stronger one ??
Children are the future
unless we stop them now
unless we stop them now
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
It's already a very tough spring, at its maximum 3 bar rating it's having to hold back around 15 kilos of pressure. The problem as I explained is that it needs a certain amount of flow to work as an auto valve. It's to do with the amount of air going into the chamber versus the amount of air being dumped by the valve. For this reason I can't currently use the valve at its maximum rating.POLAND_SPUD wrote:I don't quite get it... couldn't you simply replace the spring with a stronger one?
One possible solution would be to reduce the chamber size to almost nothing.
Also, I agree wholeheartedly with your assesment of marbles as very poor ammunition, I wish there was a better large calibre ammunition that was in plentiful and cheap supply.
Worth noting too that for a relatively low rate of fire, the tee/detent breech was more than adequate to provide a reliable supply with no double feeds.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
3 bar? Psssh....
Nice work though. The low rate of fire seems to help feeding.
Can't you pressurize the piston (or diaphragm) from behind? (instead of a stronger spring)
However, I may get some scuba tanks soon and manufacture my own popoff. I'm thinking.... 35 bar popping pressure...
I might also try to use this design instead of pilotting a QEV with the popoff.
Nice work though. The low rate of fire seems to help feeding.
Can't you pressurize the piston (or diaphragm) from behind? (instead of a stronger spring)
Currently, the popoff pops at 19 bar.3 bar rattlesnake wrote:If you're talking about this one, psycix is running that at 30 bar, that's 10 times the maximum rating of my valve and for reasons pointed out above I'm actually running much lower than that, I doubt it's popping at more than 20 psi (though I'm feeding 110 psi into the chamber).
However, I may get some scuba tanks soon and manufacture my own popoff. I'm thinking.... 35 bar popping pressure...
I might also try to use this design instead of pilotting a QEV with the popoff.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
That might actually work, I can make a gas piston out of a 10mL syringe that fits instead of the coil spring which will have a 1:3 area ratio to the main piston seat so pressurised to 300 psi it should hold 100 psi... hmmm...psycix wrote:Can't you pressurize the piston (or diaphragm) from behind? (instead of a stronger spring)
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Knowing you I expect it to be curing the next time you post.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
Am I that predictable? Results some time tomorrow evening
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- POLAND_SPUD
- Captain
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 4:43 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
@psycix
LPG tanks are rated to about 25 bar IIRC (burst pressure ~ 70 bar) good but I would rather have something rated a little bit higher for a fridge compressor... though I have to admit they are really dirt cheap and have large capacity (40 - 120 L)
CNG tanks are rated to about 200 bar !! they also have large capacity but they are kind of expensive (at least in Poland)
I've seen a lot of cheap used scuba tanks but either they are to heavy to be shipped or their capacity is low... are you buying them off ebay ?
@JSR
hmmm why don't you buy an LPG tank and attach it to your compressor ?
that would solve your problems
also I know I suggest it from time to time but you should really build a fridge compressor
have considered using LPG or CNG tanks??scuba tanks soon
LPG tanks are rated to about 25 bar IIRC (burst pressure ~ 70 bar) good but I would rather have something rated a little bit higher for a fridge compressor... though I have to admit they are really dirt cheap and have large capacity (40 - 120 L)
CNG tanks are rated to about 200 bar !! they also have large capacity but they are kind of expensive (at least in Poland)
I've seen a lot of cheap used scuba tanks but either they are to heavy to be shipped or their capacity is low... are you buying them off ebay ?
@JSR
hmmm why don't you buy an LPG tank and attach it to your compressor ?
that would solve your problems
also I know I suggest it from time to time but you should really build a fridge compressor
Children are the future
unless we stop them now
unless we stop them now
I have to point out that psycix was feeding it 30 bar, but IIRC, it was popping at around 100 psi (?). It'll be interesting to see how this performs with an air spring.jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:
If you're talking aboutthis one, psycix is running that at 30 bar, that's 10 times the maximum rating of my valve and for reasons pointed out above I'm actually running much lower than that, I doubt it's popping at more than 20 psi (though I'm feeding 110 psi into the chamber).
POLAND_SPUD wrote:even if there was no link I'd know it's a bot because of female name
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
What I've done is made the chamber smaller (dramatically so, practically tapped the blowgun directly into the valve) so it gives me some leeway when playing with flow rates. We'll see how it performs at 100 psi.POLAND_SPUD wrote:hmmm why don't you buy an LPG tank and attach it to your compressor?
I'm always on the look out for dumped fridges but no luck yet, in the meantime my 450/600/850 psi fill station is catering to my HPA needsalso I know I suggest it from time to time but you should really build a fridge compressor
Actually, from the man himself:ramses wrote:I have to point out that psycix was feeding it 30 bar, but IIRC, it was popping at around 100 psi (?)
That's about 280 psi, at least 10 times higher than what I'm using.psycix wrote:Currently, the popoff pops at 19 bar.
Curing as we speak, I hope it's reinforced enough to take the 300 psi it needs to hold back 100 psi at the seat (and the subsequent pressure spike when the piston pops), we'll see.It'll be interesting to see how this performs with an air spring.
edit: might take a bit longer, I was pressurising it to remove the piston, which didn't budge till about 100 psi then shot out into the wall and shattered *sigh*
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
Technically it can still be made to work, the air spring was completed and it works, but it needs a bigger chamber to cycle and I never bothered making one.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life