Thanks.jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:It's down to the relatively low acceleration compared to a 12 bore, the same reason why pneumatics were used to fire dynamite until desensetised explosives were developed to enable them to be fired from powder burning artillery.High-PSI wrote:Honestly, though the recoil is high, it is soft. It is hard to describe. Basically, there is alot of rearward travel of the cannon when fired, but it is not a sharp blow to the shoulder like a 12 guage shotgun would be, kind of like the difference between being hit in the shoulder with a slow moving sledge hammer versus a fast moving fist.
Knowing the weight and velocity of your projectile, and the weight of your launcher, you can calculate the recoil energy. In this case, you should also add the mass of air in the chamber to the mass of the projectile, as it makes a significant difference.Oh, one quick question, (and I know this is a vague description), at 210 psi, it had a bit of kick. However, at 230 psi the recoil felt like the pressure was far more than a mere 10% higher. It is almost like the recoil energy increase is exponential, not linear as the pressure rises.
Technically, recoil energy should be roughly proportional to pressure, I would put the perceived exponential increase down to your impression - though it would be interesting to mount the launcher on a free-moving trolley and quantify the results.
It is a funny thing, there is plenty of recoil that really throws you backward. But, it is not painful in any way. I think I could take about twice the recoil it has now before it hurts. I am not sure I could stay on my feet, though.

The increase in recoil me, indeed, be my personal impression and nothing else. That is possible.
Matt