





hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
CpTn_lAw wrote:"yay, me wanna make big multishot pnoob with 1000 psi foot pump compressor using diamond as main material. Do you think wet bread make good sealant? "
![]()
I love the determinationkeks2033 wrote:I tried to make a balanced valve and I did it.
Isn't the CBHV as Brian made it like the second diagram in my original post?They're missing BtB's cbhv, which is like the balanced poppet valve, but rather than a vented piston, it has a closed chamber - when the valve opens, the chamber is pressurised, as the pressure drops in the barrel it closes.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
A spring is implied in the other designs though, otherwise they wouldn't re-close.mrfoo wrote:It's the positive closing action the others are missing.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Any idea on exactly why this was happening? It seems a bit weird if other o-ring joints subject to the same (admittedly violent) forces aren't failing in the same way. A couple of things occur to me, viz:either the o-ring would fail or high pressure air would find itself in the chamber
It is on paper but I've found it to be a case of "sounds good, doesn't work" in practice, at least in the context of my limited experimentation in this area. I'm definitely a relative newbie when it comes to this sort of valve.I find the spring-less nature of the design very elegant
There's a lot of tweaking in the "proper" airgun community when it comes to hammer valves, much more that I've been aware of until recently. One of the areas of interest is the use of different materials as a seat for the stem valves as some "unstick" more easily and give visibly better performance. In that regard the use of a spool with an o-ring on each side seems to be less than optimal and indeed with sufficiently high pressure there's the risk that the o-ring will be blown out. In that context you'd want a bit of pressure differential in order to help the valve seal against the seat.to the point that the valve faces themselves could be of identical diameter, making the machining much simpler
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
If *you're* a newbie...jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:I'm definitely a relative newbie when it comes to this sort of valve.
Yeah, that seems reasonable.jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:In that context you'd want a bit of pressure differential in order to help the valve seal against the seat.
Not to pneumatics in general of course but when it comes to hammer valves there are a lot of enthusiasts that have been playing with this sort of valve since they are the dominant configuration for commercial airguns. I've been hanging around the GTA forums lately and it was eye-opening to see the levels to which such valved are modified and tuned, and the various technologies to optimize them, like say the Daystate "slingshot hammer". We're mostly concerned with dumping chambers on this forum but for commercial airguns, getting the most shots with consistent velocity is a higher priority and tinkerers engineer accordingly.mrfoo wrote:if *you're* a newbie...
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life